QDPL vs. PFFA
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA).
QDPL and PFFA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QDPL is an actively managed fund by Pacer. It was launched on Jul 12, 2021. PFFA is an actively managed fund by Virtus Investment Partners. It was launched on May 15, 2018.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QDPL or PFFA.
Key characteristics
| QDPL | PFFA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 17.29% | 17.15% |
| 1Y Return | 25.49% | 26.79% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.06% | 6.27% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.24 | 2.60 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.42% | 10.36% |
| Max Drawdown | -22.59% | -70.52% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.76% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between QDPL and PFFA is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
QDPL vs. PFFA - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QDPL having a 17.29% return and PFFA slightly lower at 17.15%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QDPL vs. PFFA - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDPL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PFFA's 1.47% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QDPL vs. PFFA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QDPL vs. PFFA - Dividend Comparison
QDPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%, less than PFFA's 8.79% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDPL Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF | 5.51% | 6.30% | 7.27% | 2.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFFA Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF | 8.79% | 9.56% | 10.75% | 7.64% | 8.54% | 10.02% | 5.15% |
Drawdowns
QDPL vs. PFFA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDPL drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, smaller than the maximum PFFA drawdown of -70.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDPL and PFFA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QDPL vs. PFFA - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) has a higher volatility of 3.45% compared to Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) at 1.33%. This indicates that QDPL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.