QDF vs. NOBL
Compare and contrast key facts about FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL).
QDF and NOBL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QDF is a passively managed fund by Northern Trust that tracks the performance of the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index. It was launched on Dec 14, 2012. NOBL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. Both QDF and NOBL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QDF or NOBL.
Correlation
The correlation between QDF and NOBL is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
QDF vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
QDF:
1.69
NOBL:
0.80
QDF:
2.31
NOBL:
1.16
QDF:
1.31
NOBL:
1.14
QDF:
3.33
NOBL:
1.04
QDF:
10.46
NOBL:
3.13
QDF:
1.83%
NOBL:
2.61%
QDF:
11.31%
NOBL:
10.21%
QDF:
-36.66%
NOBL:
-35.43%
QDF:
-1.93%
NOBL:
-6.51%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QDF achieves a 19.27% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 8.08% return. Over the past 10 years, QDF has outperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 9.96%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.40% annualized return.
QDF
19.27%
-1.29%
9.11%
19.06%
10.76%
9.96%
NOBL
8.08%
-6.13%
5.86%
8.01%
8.20%
9.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QDF vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
QDF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QDF vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QDF vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
QDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than NOBL's 2.03% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QDF FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund | 1.89% | 2.18% | 2.45% | 1.90% | 2.38% | 3.05% | 4.30% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 3.04% | 2.69% | 2.08% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.03% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% | 1.60% | 0.30% |
Drawdowns
QDF vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QDF drawdown since its inception was -36.66%, roughly equal to the maximum NOBL drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QDF and NOBL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QDF vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund (QDF) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 2.98%. This indicates that QDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.