QCLN vs. FAN
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) and First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN).
QCLN and FAN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QCLN is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy. It was launched on Feb 8, 2007. FAN is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the ISE Clean Edge Global Wind Energy Index. It was launched on Jun 16, 2008. Both QCLN and FAN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QCLN or FAN.
Correlation
The correlation between QCLN and FAN is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
QCLN vs. FAN - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
QCLN:
-0.45
FAN:
-0.23
QCLN:
-0.45
FAN:
-0.19
QCLN:
0.95
FAN:
0.98
QCLN:
-0.23
FAN:
-0.11
QCLN:
-0.78
FAN:
-0.60
QCLN:
19.20%
FAN:
7.14%
QCLN:
33.36%
FAN:
18.39%
QCLN:
-76.18%
FAN:
-81.36%
QCLN:
-59.98%
FAN:
-38.75%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QCLN achieves a -17.16% return, which is significantly lower than FAN's -7.98% return. Over the past 10 years, QCLN has outperformed FAN with an annualized return of 7.95%, while FAN has yielded a comparatively lower 6.22% annualized return.
QCLN
-17.16%
3.58%
1.26%
-17.47%
7.70%
7.95%
FAN
-7.98%
-3.66%
-8.96%
-6.22%
2.27%
6.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QCLN vs. FAN - Expense Ratio Comparison
QCLN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FAN's 0.62% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QCLN vs. FAN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) and First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QCLN vs. FAN - Dividend Comparison
QCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than FAN's 1.76% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 0.74% | 0.76% | 0.33% | 0.01% | 0.30% | 0.85% | 1.03% | 0.45% | 1.25% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 0.41% |
FAN First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF | 1.50% | 1.72% | 1.50% | 1.80% | 0.83% | 2.42% | 2.68% | 2.59% | 6.04% | 2.36% | 2.61% | 0.71% |
Drawdowns
QCLN vs. FAN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QCLN drawdown since its inception was -76.18%, smaller than the maximum FAN drawdown of -81.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCLN and FAN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QCLN vs. FAN - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a higher volatility of 9.34% compared to First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) at 4.77%. This indicates that QCLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.