PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
QCLN vs. COP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QCLN and COP is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

QCLN vs. COP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-5.47%
-4.57%
QCLN
COP

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QCLN:

0.03

COP:

0.01

Sortino Ratio

QCLN:

0.28

COP:

0.17

Omega Ratio

QCLN:

1.03

COP:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

QCLN:

0.01

COP:

0.01

Martin Ratio

QCLN:

0.09

COP:

0.02

Ulcer Index

QCLN:

10.20%

COP:

14.82%

Daily Std Dev

QCLN:

33.52%

COP:

22.26%

Max Drawdown

QCLN:

-76.18%

COP:

-70.66%

Current Drawdown

QCLN:

-59.75%

COP:

-20.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QCLN achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly lower than COP's 5.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QCLN having a 8.33% annualized return and COP not far ahead at 8.50%.


QCLN

YTD

2.68%

1M

0.46%

6M

-5.47%

1Y

-1.69%

5Y*

5.63%

10Y*

8.33%

COP

YTD

5.15%

1M

9.63%

6M

-4.57%

1Y

-0.80%

5Y*

15.11%

10Y*

8.50%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

QCLN vs. COP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QCLN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QCLN is 77
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QCLN is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QCLN is 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QCLN is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QCLN is 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QCLN is 77
Martin Ratio Rank

COP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COP is 4242
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COP is 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COP is 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COP is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COP is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COP is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QCLN vs. COP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) and ConocoPhillips Company (COP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for QCLN, currently valued at 0.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.030.01
The chart of Sortino ratio for QCLN, currently valued at 0.28, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.000.280.17
The chart of Omega ratio for QCLN, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market1.002.003.001.031.02
The chart of Calmar ratio for QCLN, currently valued at 0.01, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.010.01
The chart of Martin ratio for QCLN, currently valued at 0.09, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.000.090.02
QCLN
COP

The current QCLN Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is higher than the COP Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QCLN and COP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.80-0.60-0.40-0.200.000.20AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.03
0.01
QCLN
COP

Dividends

QCLN vs. COP - Dividend Comparison

QCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than COP's 2.99% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QCLN
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund
0.85%0.87%0.76%0.33%0.01%0.30%0.85%1.03%0.45%1.25%0.72%0.78%
COP
ConocoPhillips Company
2.99%3.15%3.37%5.39%2.70%4.23%2.05%1.86%1.93%1.99%6.30%4.11%

Drawdowns

QCLN vs. COP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QCLN drawdown since its inception was -76.18%, which is greater than COP's maximum drawdown of -70.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QCLN and COP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-59.75%
-20.28%
QCLN
COP

Volatility

QCLN vs. COP - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a higher volatility of 10.46% compared to ConocoPhillips Company (COP) at 5.20%. This indicates that QCLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
10.46%
5.20%
QCLN
COP
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab