QBTC.TO vs. MSTR

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about The Bitcoin Fund (QBTC.TO) and MicroStrategy Incorporated (MSTR).

Performance

QBTC.TO vs. MSTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in The Bitcoin Fund (QBTC.TO) and MicroStrategy Incorporated (MSTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QBTC.TO vs. MSTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QBTC.TO The Bitcoin Fund	-19.21%	-13.99%	135.40%	170.25%	-65.85%	26.10%	112.52%
MSTR MicroStrategy Incorporated	-18.17%	-49.94%	397.93%	336.33%	-72.15%	38.87%	106.17%

Different Trading Currencies

QBTC.TO is traded in CAD, while MSTR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MSTR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) QBTC.TO : CA$204.56M MSTR : $477.23M
Gross Profit (TTM) QBTC.TO : CA$73.70M MSTR : $327.82M
EBITDA (TTM) QBTC.TO : CA$610.43M MSTR : -$5.44B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QBTC.TO achieves a -19.21% return, which is significantly lower than MSTR's -18.17% return.

QBTC.TO

• 1D: 1.78%
• 1M: 0.94%
• YTD: -19.21%
• 6M: -41.18%
• 1Y: -23.86%
• 3Y*: 31.24%
• 5Y*: 2.72%
• 10Y*: —

MSTR

• 1D: -1.76%
• 1M: -9.35%
• YTD: -18.17%
• 6M: -63.82%
• 1Y: -61.02%
• 3Y*: 62.84%
• 5Y*: 14.09%
• 10Y*: 21.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

QBTC.TO vs. MSTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QBTC.TO

QBTC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 21
QBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
QBTC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
QBTC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 19
QBTC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
QBTC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 25

MSTR

MSTR Risk / Return Rank: 11
MSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
MSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
MSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 10
MSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
MSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QBTC.TO vs. MSTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Bitcoin Fund (QBTC.TO) and MicroStrategy Incorporated (MSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QBTC.TO	MSTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.55	-0.84	+0.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.56	-1.34	+0.78
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	0.85	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.43	-0.77	+0.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.92	-1.34	+0.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QBTC.TO vs. MSTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QBTC.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is higher than the MSTR Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QBTC.TO and MSTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QBTC.TO	MSTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.55	-0.84	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05	0.16	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.39	+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between QBTC.TO and MSTR is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

QBTC.TO vs. MSTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither QBTC.TO nor MSTR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

QBTC.TO vs. MSTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QBTC.TO drawdown since its inception was -78.06%, smaller than the maximum MSTR drawdown of -88.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QBTC.TO and MSTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	QBTC.TO	MSTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.06%	-99.86%	+21.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.18%	-76.53%	+26.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.06%	-84.11%	+6.05%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-89.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.03%	-74.09%	+29.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.26%	-86.60%	+55.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.41%	44.22%	-20.81%

Volatility

QBTC.TO vs. MSTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Bitcoin Fund (QBTC.TO) is 13.81%, while MicroStrategy Incorporated (MSTR) has a volatility of 18.27%. This indicates that QBTC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QBTC.TO	MSTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.81%	18.27%	-4.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.74%	55.21%	-18.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.82%	73.24%	-29.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	54.85%	89.67%	-34.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.98%	71.95%	-12.97%

Financials