PortfoliosLab logo
QAT vs. IEMG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QAT and IEMG is 0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

QAT vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

QAT:

5.71%

IEMG:

11.91%

Max Drawdown

QAT:

-0.22%

IEMG:

-1.76%

Current Drawdown

QAT:

0.00%

IEMG:

-1.12%

Returns By Period


QAT

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

IEMG

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QAT vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QAT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.14% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

QAT vs. IEMG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QAT is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QAT is 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QAT is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QAT is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QAT is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QAT is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

IEMG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IEMG is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IEMG is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IEMG is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IEMG is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IEMG is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IEMG is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QAT vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Qatar ETF (QAT) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

QAT vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

QAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, more than IEMG's 3.01% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QAT
iShares MSCI Qatar ETF
5.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
3.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QAT vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QAT drawdown since its inception was -0.22%, smaller than the maximum IEMG drawdown of -1.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QAT and IEMG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

QAT vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...