PZZA vs. TM
PZZA (Papa John's International, Inc.) and TM (Toyota Motor Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — PZZA in Restaurants, TM in Auto Manufacturers. Over the past 10 years, PZZA returned -4.08%/yr vs 7.70%/yr for TM. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PZZA vs. TM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PZZA achieves a -5.75% return, which is significantly higher than TM's -21.88% return. Over the past 10 years, PZZA has underperformed TM with an annualized return of -4.08%, while TM has yielded a comparatively higher 7.70% annualized return.
PZZA
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- 5.75%
- YTD
- -5.75%
- 6M
- -6.94%
- 1Y
- -24.40%
- 3Y*
- -17.51%
- 5Y*
- -17.04%
- 10Y*
- -4.08%
TM
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- -11.56%
- YTD
- -21.88%
- 6M
- -23.72%
- 1Y
- -0.69%
- 3Y*
- 5.39%
- 5Y*
- 1.30%
- 10Y*
- 7.70%
PZZA vs. TM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZZA Papa John's International, Inc. | -5.75% | -2.01% | -44.21% | -5.28% | -37.26% | 58.87% | 35.88% | 61.50% | -27.80% | -33.68% |
TM Toyota Motor Corporation | -21.88% | 13.82% | 8.88% | 38.23% | -24.43% | 23.21% | 13.62% | 22.69% | -5.81% | 12.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between PZZA and TM is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 1999 | 0.23 |
The correlation between PZZA and TM shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PZZA:
$1.17B
TM:
$217.96B
PZZA:
$1.11
TM:
¥2.98K
PZZA:
31.92
TM:
9.06
PZZA:
0.58
TM:
0.69
PZZA:
$2.01B
TM:
¥51.16T
PZZA:
$469.77M
TM:
¥8.54T
PZZA:
$219.44M
TM:
¥7.11T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PZZA vs. TM — Risk / Return Rank
PZZA
TM
PZZA vs. TM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Papa John's International, Inc. (PZZA) and Toyota Motor Corporation (TM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PZZA | TM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.02 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | -0.02 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.90 | -0.06 | -0.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PZZA vs. TM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PZZA drawdown since its inception was -76.22%, which is greater than TM's maximum drawdown of -60.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PZZA and TM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PZZA | TM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.22% | -60.15% | -16.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.11% | -32.65% | -10.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.15% | -34.92% | -27.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.22% | -36.80% | -39.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.22% | -36.80% | -39.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.73% | -32.65% | -38.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.18% | -22.17% | -4.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.24% | 12.24% | +15.00% |
Volatility
PZZA vs. TM - Volatility Comparison
Papa John's International, Inc. (PZZA) has a higher volatility of 16.22% compared to Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) at 7.33%. This indicates that PZZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PZZA | TM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.22% | 7.33% | +8.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.89% | 20.53% | +17.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.97% | 29.47% | +21.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.97% | 26.96% | +15.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.95% | 23.60% | +18.35% |
Dividends
PZZA vs. TM - Dividend Comparison
PZZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, more than TM's 1.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PZZA Papa John's International, Inc. | 5.21% | 4.78% | 4.48% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 0.86% | 1.06% | 1.43% | 2.26% | 1.51% | 0.88% | 1.13% |
TM Toyota Motor Corporation | 1.71% | 2.95% | 2.81% | 2.45% | 2.90% | 2.45% | 2.74% | 1.30% | 3.40% | 2.96% | 3.23% | 5.59% |
Financials
PZZA vs. TM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Papa John's International, Inc. and Toyota Motor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PZZA vs. TM - Profitability Comparison
PZZA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Papa John's International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 137.72M and revenue of 478.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.8%.
TM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.94T and revenue of 12.83T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.
PZZA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Papa John's International, Inc. reported an operating income of 20.76M and revenue of 478.61M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
TM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported an operating income of 579.96B and revenue of 12.83T, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
PZZA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Papa John's International, Inc. reported a net income of 15.21M and revenue of 478.61M, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.
TM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported a net income of 832.22B and revenue of 12.83T, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PZZA and TM have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PZZA has higher volatility (16.22%) compared to TM (7.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PZZA dropped -76.22% vs TM's -60.15%.
TM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.02 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PZZA and TM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer