PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PYPY vs. AVES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PYPY vs. AVES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) and Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYPY achieves a -1.57% return, which is significantly lower than AVES's 7.59% return.


PYPY

1D
-0.37%
1M
24.91%
6M
6.78%
YTD
-1.57%
1Y
-14.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.74%

AVES

1D
-0.75%
1M
-4.02%
6M
0.78%
YTD
7.59%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.66M$7.29M$6.23M
$726.92K$509.19K$412.49K

PYPY vs. AVES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PYPY
Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF
-1.57%-30.17%43.88%6.19%
AVES
Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF
7.59%30.49%4.50%8.60%

Correlation

The correlation between PYPY and AVES is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2023

0.33

The correlation between PYPY and AVES shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PYPY vs. AVES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PYPY
PYPY Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PYPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYPY Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PYPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYPY Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

AVES
AVES Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
AVES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVES Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVES Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
AVES Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVES Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PYPY vs. AVES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) and Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PYPYAVESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.18

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

1.44

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.59

4.35

-4.95

PYPY vs. AVES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYPY Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the AVES Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYPY and AVES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PYPY vs. AVES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYPY drawdown since its inception was -53.64%, which is greater than AVES's maximum drawdown of -27.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYPY and AVES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PYPYAVESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.64%

-27.40%

-26.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.75%

-12.90%

-31.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.79%

-9.48%

-25.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.74%

-7.66%

-10.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.54%

4.26%

+23.28%

Volatility

PYPY vs. AVES - Volatility Comparison

Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF (PYPY) has a higher volatility of 15.29% compared to Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) at 6.96%. This indicates that PYPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PYPYAVESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.29%

6.96%

+8.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.67%

18.01%

+14.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.58%

20.01%

+16.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.06%

17.49%

+14.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.06%

17.49%

+14.57%

PYPY vs. AVES - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYPY has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than AVES's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

PYPY vs. AVES - Dividend Comparison

PYPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 56.79%, more than AVES's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AVES
Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF
2.59%3.17%4.09%3.96%3.70%0.62%
PYPY
Yieldmax PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF
56.79%64.68%48.65%5.70%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PYPY and AVES have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYPY has higher volatility (15.29%) compared to AVES (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYPY dropped -53.64% vs AVES's -27.40%.

On 1-year performance, AVES leads with 19.41% vs -14.80% for PYPY. On fees, AVES is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, AVES has been the lower-risk option at 6.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVES has performed better with a 19.41% return vs -14.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVES is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for PYPY.

PYPY has the higher dividend yield at 56.79%, compared with 2.59% for AVES.

PYPY is categorized as Derivative Income, while AVES is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for PYPY and 0.36% for AVES.

AVES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PYPY and AVES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer