PWZ vs. SCHP
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PWZ) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP).
PWZ and SCHP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PWZ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA California Long-Term Core Plus Muni. It was launched on Oct 11, 2007. SCHP is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) Index (Series-L). It was launched on Aug 5, 2010. Both PWZ and SCHP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PWZ or SCHP.
Correlation
The correlation between PWZ and SCHP is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
PWZ vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PWZ:
0.36
SCHP:
0.33
PWZ:
0.54
SCHP:
0.49
PWZ:
1.07
SCHP:
1.06
PWZ:
0.28
SCHP:
0.14
PWZ:
1.76
SCHP:
1.15
PWZ:
1.20%
SCHP:
1.34%
PWZ:
5.94%
SCHP:
4.61%
PWZ:
-21.50%
SCHP:
-14.26%
PWZ:
-4.62%
SCHP:
-7.60%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PWZ having a 1.66% return and SCHP slightly lower at 1.63%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PWZ having a 2.28% annualized return and SCHP not far behind at 2.18%.
PWZ
1.66%
-1.03%
0.63%
2.11%
0.55%
2.28%
SCHP
1.63%
-0.93%
0.54%
1.79%
1.76%
2.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PWZ vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWZ has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.05% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PWZ vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PWZ) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PWZ vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
PWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, more than SCHP's 3.00% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWZ Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 3.30% | 2.85% | 2.49% | 2.28% | 2.34% | 2.51% | 2.54% | 2.49% | 2.87% | 3.17% | 3.81% | 3.96% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 3.00% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.63% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% | 1.30% | 0.67% |
Drawdowns
PWZ vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWZ drawdown since its inception was -21.50%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWZ and SCHP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PWZ vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PWZ) has a higher volatility of 1.79% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.31%. This indicates that PWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.