PWZ vs. FBND
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PWZ) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND).
PWZ and FBND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PWZ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA California Long-Term Core Plus Muni. It was launched on Oct 11, 2007. FBND is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 6, 2014.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PWZ or FBND.
Key characteristics
| PWZ | FBND | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 0.34% | -0.57% |
| 1Y Return | 3.81% | 3.26% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -1.40% | -1.89% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 1.04% | 1.25% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.62 | 0.48 |
| Daily Std Dev | 6.32% | 6.66% |
| Max Drawdown | -21.49% | -17.25% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.86% | -8.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWZ and FBND is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
PWZ vs. FBND - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PWZ achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's -0.57% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PWZ vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWZ has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PWZ vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PWZ) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PWZ vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison
PWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than FBND's 4.54% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWZ Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF | 3.00% | 2.84% | 2.49% | 2.28% | 2.34% | 2.51% | 2.53% | 2.48% | 2.86% | 3.16% | 3.80% | 3.97% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.54% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% | 0.66% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PWZ vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWZ drawdown since its inception was -21.49%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWZ and FBND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PWZ vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond ETF (PWZ) is 1.14%, while Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) has a volatility of 1.47%. This indicates that PWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.