PWV vs. VDIGX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PWV (Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF) and VDIGX (Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund) are both funds - PWV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Large Cap Value Intellidex Index (AMEX), while VDIGX is a Dividend fund actively managed by Vanguard. PWV is passively managed, while VDIGX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, PWV returned 12.27%/yr vs 12.33%/yr for VDIGX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PWV charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for VDIGX.

Performance

PWV vs. VDIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) and Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund (VDIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWV achieves a 14.78% return, which is significantly higher than VDIGX's 2.69% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PWV having a 12.27% annualized return and VDIGX not far ahead at 12.33%.

PWV

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: 1.86%
• YTD: 14.78%
• 6M: 14.57%
• 1Y: 27.50%
• 3Y*: 21.17%
• 5Y*: 14.04%
• 10Y*: 12.27%

VDIGX

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: 2.69%
• 6M: 2.42%
• 1Y: 10.98%
• 3Y*: 13.24%
• 5Y*: 10.35%
• 10Y*: 12.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWV vs. VDIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PWV Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF	14.78%	19.65%	14.48%	10.36%	-1.16%	29.06%	-3.77%	29.84%	-14.12%	16.98%
VDIGX Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund	2.69%	11.11%	20.84%	8.11%	-4.89%	24.86%	12.04%	30.94%	0.08%	19.32%

Correlation

The correlation between PWV and VDIGX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005	0.87

The correlation between PWV and VDIGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PWV vs. VDIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWV

PWV Risk / Return Rank: 91
PWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
PWV Omega Ratio Rank: 87
PWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
PWV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

VDIGX

VDIGX Risk / Return Rank: 16
VDIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
VDIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
VDIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
VDIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
VDIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWV vs. VDIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) and Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund (VDIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PWV	VDIGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.90	1.05	+1.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.18	1.60	+2.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.19	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.81	1.18	+5.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.78	4.58	+18.20

PWV vs. VDIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWV Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is higher than the VDIGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWV and VDIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PWV vs. VDIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWV drawdown since its inception was -49.04%, which is greater than VDIGX's maximum drawdown of -45.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWV and VDIGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PWV	VDIGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.04%	-45.23%	-3.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.05%	-9.09%	+5.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.31%	-10.23%	-4.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.36%	-16.18%	-0.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.67%	-32.98%	-4.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.08%	-0.63%	-0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.48%	-6.64%	-2.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.21%	2.34%	-1.13%

Volatility

PWV vs. VDIGX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF (PWV) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund (VDIGX) at 3.11%. This indicates that PWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PWV	VDIGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.30%	3.11%	+0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.99%	7.81%	-0.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.55%	10.22%	-0.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.33%	13.89%	+0.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.18%	15.71%	+1.47%

PWV vs. VDIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWV has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than VDIGX's 0.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

PWV vs. VDIGX - Dividend Comparison

PWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than VDIGX's 23.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PWV Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Value ETF	2.33%	2.12%	2.08%	2.16%	2.29%	1.89%	2.66%	2.24%	2.34%	1.55%	2.35%	2.42%
VDIGX Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund	23.91%	21.90%	21.94%	2.29%	6.06%	5.45%	2.83%	4.70%	8.72%	5.16%	2.86%	5.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PWV and VDIGX in my portfolio?

PWV and VDIGX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PWV or VDIGX?

PWV has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to VDIGX (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWV dropped -49.04% vs VDIGX's -45.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.