PWR vs. ROP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP).

Performance

PWR vs. ROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PWR vs. ROP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.	30.11%	33.70%	46.60%	51.70%	24.63%	59.50%	77.74%	35.84%	-22.93%	12.22%
ROP Roper Technologies, Inc.	-20.34%	-13.85%	-4.11%	26.92%	-11.64%	14.69%	22.39%	33.66%	3.51%	42.39%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PWR : $83.28B ROP : $38.15B
EPS PWR : $6.79 ROP : $14.20
PE Ratio PWR : 80.81 ROP : 24.91
PEG Ratio PWR : 4.00 ROP : 2.95
PS Ratio PWR : 2.93 ROP : 4.84
PB Ratio PWR : 9.32 ROP : 1.92
Total Revenue (TTM) PWR : $28.35B ROP : $7.90B
Gross Profit (TTM) PWR : $3.69B ROP : $5.47B
EBITDA (TTM) PWR : $2.61B ROP : $3.13B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWR achieves a 30.11% return, which is significantly higher than ROP's -20.34% return. Over the past 10 years, PWR has outperformed ROP with an annualized return of 37.93%, while ROP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.36% annualized return.

PWR

• 1D: 2.86%
• 1M: -2.50%
• YTD: 30.11%
• 6M: 32.55%
• 1Y: 116.24%
• 3Y*: 49.01%
• 5Y*: 44.09%
• 10Y*: 37.93%

ROP

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 1.18%
• YTD: -20.34%
• 6M: -28.78%
• 1Y: -39.58%
• 3Y*: -6.49%
• 5Y*: -2.37%
• 10Y*: 7.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PWR vs. ROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWR

PWR Risk / Return Rank: 97
PWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
PWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
PWR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
PWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PWR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

ROP

ROP Risk / Return Rank: 4
ROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
ROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
ROP Omega Ratio Rank: 2
ROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
ROP Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWR vs. ROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PWR	ROP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.29	-1.57	+4.86
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.82	-2.24	+6.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	0.71	+0.81
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.96	-0.84	+10.80
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	24.49	-1.75	+26.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PWR vs. ROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWR Sharpe Ratio is 3.29, which is higher than the ROP Sharpe Ratio of -1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWR and ROP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PWR	ROP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.29	-1.57	+4.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.28	-0.11	+1.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.15	0.32	+0.83
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.51	-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between PWR and ROP is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PWR vs. ROP - Dividend Comparison

PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than ROP's 0.96% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.	0.07%	0.09%	0.09%	0.15%	0.25%	0.16%	0.29%	0.42%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ROP Roper Technologies, Inc.	0.96%	0.74%	0.58%	0.50%	0.57%	0.46%	0.48%	0.52%	0.62%	0.54%	0.66%	0.53%

Drawdowns

PWR vs. ROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWR drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than ROP's maximum drawdown of -58.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWR and ROP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PWR	ROP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.07%	-58.94%	-38.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.66%	-46.24%	+34.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.89%	-46.51%	+12.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.53%	-46.51%	+0.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.09%	-40.01%	+34.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.15%	-11.25%	-35.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.74%	22.21%	-17.47%

Volatility

PWR vs. ROP - Volatility Comparison

Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) has a higher volatility of 11.17% compared to Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP) at 5.84%. This indicates that PWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PWR	ROP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.17%	5.84%	+5.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.43%	20.51%	+5.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.55%	25.26%	+10.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.66%	20.95%	+13.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.20%	23.19%	+10.01%

Financials

PWR vs. ROP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Quanta Services, Inc. and Roper Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 985.00M and revenue of 7.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.6%.

ROP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Roper Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.43B and revenue of 2.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.5%.

PWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 485.00M and revenue of 7.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.

ROP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Roper Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 588.30M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.6%.

PWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 315.50M and revenue of 7.84B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.

ROP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Roper Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 428.40M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in a net margin of 20.8%.