PWR vs. LMT
Compare and contrast key facts about Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PWR or LMT.
Correlation
The correlation between PWR and LMT is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PWR vs. LMT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PWR:
2.13
LMT:
0.59
PWR:
2.89
LMT:
0.91
PWR:
1.38
LMT:
1.13
PWR:
4.46
LMT:
0.43
PWR:
13.45
LMT:
1.22
PWR:
5.12%
LMT:
8.40%
PWR:
32.26%
LMT:
17.45%
PWR:
-97.07%
LMT:
-70.23%
PWR:
-2.61%
LMT:
-19.72%
Fundamentals
PWR:
$49.81B
LMT:
$116.22B
PWR:
$5.43
LMT:
$27.85
PWR:
62.15
LMT:
17.61
PWR:
2.01
LMT:
3.98
PWR:
$17.12B
LMT:
$52.42B
PWR:
$2.26B
LMT:
$6.33B
PWR:
$1.41B
LMT:
$7.57B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWR achieves a 6.81% return, which is significantly higher than LMT's 0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, PWR has outperformed LMT with an annualized return of 29.33%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively lower 12.62% annualized return.
PWR
6.81%
5.29%
30.60%
67.35%
52.78%
29.33%
LMT
0.90%
1.53%
4.47%
9.49%
5.67%
12.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PWR vs. LMT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PWR
LMT
PWR vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PWR vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison
PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than LMT's 2.60% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 0.11% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 2.60% | 2.62% | 2.68% | 2.34% | 2.98% | 2.76% | 2.31% | 3.13% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 2.83% | 2.85% |
Drawdowns
PWR vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWR drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than LMT's maximum drawdown of -70.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWR and LMT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PWR vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison
Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) has a higher volatility of 9.13% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 5.89%. This indicates that PWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
PWR vs. LMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quanta Services, Inc. and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities