PWP vs. PIPR
Compare and contrast key facts about Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) and Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PWP or PIPR.
Key characteristics
| PWP | PIPR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 60.98% | 64.56% |
| 1Y Return | 90.85% | 94.03% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 17.06% | 34.02% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.38 | 3.27 |
| Daily Std Dev | 35.52% | 28.16% |
| Max Drawdown | -60.44% | -76.97% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.76% | 0.00% |
Fundamentals
| PWP | PIPR | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $1.61B | $4.49B |
| EPS | -$2.73 | $7.63 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $725.81M | $1.44B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | -$80.73M | $1.11B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | -$228.08M | $196.35M |
Correlation
The correlation between PWP and PIPR is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
PWP vs. PIPR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PWP achieves a 60.98% return, which is significantly lower than PIPR's 64.56% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PWP vs. PIPR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) and Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PWP vs. PIPR - Dividend Comparison
PWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than PIPR's 1.21% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWP Perella Weinberg Partners | 1.44% | 2.29% | 2.86% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PIPR Piper Sandler Companies | 1.21% | 2.08% | 5.28% | 3.81% | 1.98% | 3.14% | 4.74% | 1.45% |
Drawdowns
PWP vs. PIPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWP drawdown since its inception was -60.44%, smaller than the maximum PIPR drawdown of -76.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWP and PIPR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PWP vs. PIPR - Volatility Comparison
Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) has a higher volatility of 10.47% compared to Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) at 7.88%. This indicates that PWP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
PWP vs. PIPR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Perella Weinberg Partners and Piper Sandler Companies. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities