PWP vs. PIPR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) and Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR).

Performance

PWP vs. PIPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) and Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PWP vs. PIPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PWP Perella Weinberg Partners	5.31%	-26.45%	98.18%	28.39%	-21.21%	15.04%	14.20%
PIPR Piper Sandler Companies	-8.14%	15.52%	74.24%	37.78%	-23.41%	85.33%	10.04%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PWP : $1.23B PIPR : $1.36B
EPS PWP : $0.40 PIPR : $15.82
PE Ratio PWP : 45.48 PIPR : 4.84
PEG Ratio PWP : 1.30 PIPR : 0.32
PS Ratio PWP : 2.15 PIPR : 0.73
Total Revenue (TTM) PWP : $750.90M PIPR : $1.87B
Gross Profit (TTM) PWP : $730.07M PIPR : $1.84B
EBITDA (TTM) PWP : $72.10M PIPR : $394.92M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWP achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly higher than PIPR's -8.14% return.

PWP

• 1D: 3.83%
• 1M: -1.89%
• YTD: 5.31%
• 6M: -14.22%
• 1Y: 0.06%
• 3Y*: 28.22%
• 5Y*: 12.73%
• 10Y*: —

PIPR

• 1D: 3.22%
• 1M: 5.58%
• YTD: -8.14%
• 6M: -9.88%
• 1Y: 26.85%
• 3Y*: 33.19%
• 5Y*: 26.02%
• 10Y*: 23.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PWP vs. PIPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWP

PWP Risk / Return Rank: 40
PWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
PWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
PWP Omega Ratio Rank: 38
PWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
PWP Martin Ratio Rank: 41

PIPR

PIPR Risk / Return Rank: 64
PIPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
PIPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
PIPR Omega Ratio Rank: 61
PIPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
PIPR Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWP vs. PIPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) and Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PWP	PIPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.00	0.69	-0.69
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.33	1.19	-0.85
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.16	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.01	1.10	-1.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.01	2.86	-2.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PWP vs. PIPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWP Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the PIPR Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWP and PIPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PWP	PIPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00	0.69	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	0.75	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.24	+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between PWP and PIPR is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PWP vs. PIPR - Dividend Comparison

PWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than PIPR's 2.53% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PWP Perella Weinberg Partners	1.54%	1.62%	1.17%	2.29%	2.86%	1.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PIPR Piper Sandler Companies	2.53%	1.68%	1.17%	2.09%	5.30%	3.81%	1.98%	1.88%	4.74%	1.45%

Drawdowns

PWP vs. PIPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWP drawdown since its inception was -60.44%, smaller than the maximum PIPR drawdown of -76.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWP and PIPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PWP	PIPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.44%	-76.97%	+16.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.93%	-24.56%	-9.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.44%	-42.30%	-18.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.08%	-17.46%	-12.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.72%	-30.78%	+10.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.20%	9.42%	+5.78%

Volatility

PWP vs. PIPR - Volatility Comparison

Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) has a higher volatility of 11.65% compared to Piper Sandler Companies (PIPR) at 8.35%. This indicates that PWP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PWP	PIPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.65%	8.35%	+3.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.08%	26.94%	+4.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.35%	39.30%	+7.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.23%	35.04%	+6.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.64%	37.00%	+3.64%

Financials