PWB vs. OMFL
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL).
PWB and OMFL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PWB is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2005. OMFL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 OFI Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2017. Both PWB and OMFL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PWB or OMFL.
Correlation
The correlation between PWB and OMFL is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PWB vs. OMFL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PWB:
1.98
OMFL:
0.50
PWB:
2.65
OMFL:
0.76
PWB:
1.36
OMFL:
1.10
PWB:
3.15
OMFL:
0.53
PWB:
12.51
OMFL:
1.57
PWB:
2.53%
OMFL:
4.53%
PWB:
15.96%
OMFL:
14.21%
PWB:
-52.58%
OMFL:
-33.24%
PWB:
-5.39%
OMFL:
-3.69%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWB achieves a 31.78% return, which is significantly higher than OMFL's 7.18% return.
PWB
31.78%
-0.79%
8.50%
33.44%
15.04%
13.85%
OMFL
7.18%
0.46%
3.75%
8.96%
11.81%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PWB vs. OMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWB has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than OMFL's 0.29% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PWB vs. OMFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PWB vs. OMFL - Dividend Comparison
PWB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than OMFL's 1.08% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWB Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.01% | 0.37% | 0.31% | 0.03% | 0.21% | 0.58% | 0.97% | 0.54% | 0.82% | 0.67% | 0.43% | 0.42% |
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 1.08% | 1.37% | 1.55% | 0.95% | 1.48% | 1.53% | 1.39% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PWB vs. OMFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWB drawdown since its inception was -52.58%, which is greater than OMFL's maximum drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWB and OMFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PWB vs. OMFL - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) at 4.02%. This indicates that PWB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.