PortfoliosLab logo
PW vs. FLO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PW and FLO is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

PW vs. FLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Power REIT (PW) and Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%500.00%1,000.00%1,500.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-40.47%
1,161.66%
PW
FLO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PW:

0.91

FLO:

-1.30

Sortino Ratio

PW:

2.75

FLO:

-1.72

Omega Ratio

PW:

1.33

FLO:

0.80

Calmar Ratio

PW:

1.39

FLO:

-0.69

Martin Ratio

PW:

2.98

FLO:

-1.58

Ulcer Index

PW:

46.44%

FLO:

16.32%

Daily Std Dev

PW:

193.96%

FLO:

20.66%

Max Drawdown

PW:

-99.48%

FLO:

-83.49%

Current Drawdown

PW:

-98.57%

FLO:

-35.97%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PW:

$3.97M

FLO:

$3.64B

EPS

PW:

-$7.48

FLO:

$1.17

PEG Ratio

PW:

0.00

FLO:

14.76

PS Ratio

PW:

1.30

FLO:

0.72

PB Ratio

PW:

10.82

FLO:

2.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

PW:

$2.52M

FLO:

$3.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PW:

$759.79K

FLO:

$1.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

PW:

-$19.28M

FLO:

$369.82M

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PW having a -13.89% return and FLO slightly higher at -13.76%. Over the past 10 years, PW has underperformed FLO with an annualized return of -15.77%, while FLO has yielded a comparatively higher 0.95% annualized return.


PW

YTD

-13.89%

1M

9.07%

6M

-2.12%

1Y

173.97%

5Y*

-39.16%

10Y*

-15.77%

FLO

YTD

-13.76%

1M

-0.34%

6M

-18.26%

1Y

-26.82%

5Y*

-1.11%

10Y*

0.95%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PW vs. FLO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PW is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PW is 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PW is 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PW is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PW is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PW is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FLO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLO is 55
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLO is 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLO is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLO is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLO is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLO is 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PW vs. FLO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Power REIT (PW) and Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PW Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is higher than the FLO Sharpe Ratio of -1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PW and FLO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.50-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.91
-1.30
PW
FLO

Dividends

PW vs. FLO - Dividend Comparison

PW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PW
Power REIT
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLO
Flowers Foods, Inc.
5.46%4.60%4.04%3.10%3.02%3.49%3.45%3.84%3.47%3.13%2.64%2.53%

Drawdowns

PW vs. FLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PW drawdown since its inception was -99.48%, which is greater than FLO's maximum drawdown of -83.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PW and FLO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-98.57%
-35.97%
PW
FLO

Volatility

PW vs. FLO - Volatility Comparison

Power REIT (PW) has a higher volatility of 9.19% compared to Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) at 6.72%. This indicates that PW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9.19%
6.72%
PW
FLO

Financials

PW vs. FLO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Power REIT and Flowers Foods, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
569.80K
1.11B
(PW) Total Revenue
(FLO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items