PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PVH vs. FNCMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PVH vs. FNCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PVH Corp. (PVH) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PVH achieves a 16.73% return, which is significantly higher than FNCMX's 15.79% return. Over the past 10 years, PVH has underperformed FNCMX with an annualized return of -1.97%, while FNCMX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.34% annualized return.


PVH

1D
-20.24%
1M
-11.47%
YTD
16.73%
6M
1.39%
1Y
-3.10%
3Y*
0.70%
5Y*
-6.45%
10Y*
-1.97%

FNCMX

1D
-0.88%
1M
6.11%
YTD
15.79%
6M
14.55%
1Y
38.83%
3Y*
27.53%
5Y*
15.16%
10Y*
19.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PVH vs. FNCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PVH
PVH Corp.
16.73%-36.50%-13.29%73.32%-33.66%13.63%-10.61%13.30%-32.18%52.26%
FNCMX
Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund
15.79%21.11%29.48%45.13%-32.40%22.21%44.57%36.63%-3.07%28.35%

Correlation

The correlation between PVH and FNCMX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2003

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between PVH and FNCMX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PVH vs. FNCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PVH
PVH Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PVH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PVH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
PVH Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PVH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
PVH Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FNCMX
FNCMX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FNCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FNCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PVH vs. FNCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PVH Corp. (PVH) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PVHFNCMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.42

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

3.03

-3.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.20

11.93

-12.12

PVH vs. FNCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PVH Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the FNCMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PVH and FNCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PVHFNCMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

2.43

-2.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

0.68

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

0.88

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.58

-0.45

Drawdowns

PVH vs. FNCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PVH drawdown since its inception was -85.13%, which is greater than FNCMX's maximum drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PVH and FNCMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PVHFNCMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.13%

-55.08%

-30.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.93%

-13.01%

-18.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-56.90%

-24.20%

-32.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.58%

-35.64%

-27.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.67%

-35.64%

-47.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.96%

-0.88%

-52.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.03%

-7.86%

-29.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.79%

3.30%

+13.49%

Volatility

PVH vs. FNCMX - Volatility Comparison

PVH Corp. (PVH) has a higher volatility of 27.53% compared to Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) at 4.27%. This indicates that PVH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PVHFNCMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.53%

4.27%

+23.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.58%

12.14%

+27.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.50%

16.25%

+33.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.84%

22.46%

+25.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.12%

22.05%

+27.07%

Dividends

PVH vs. FNCMX - Dividend Comparison

PVH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than FNCMX's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNCMX
Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund
0.44%0.51%0.61%0.67%0.88%0.47%0.67%4.41%1.93%0.03%1.01%1.50%
PVH
PVH Corp.
0.19%0.22%0.14%0.12%0.21%0.04%0.04%0.14%0.16%0.11%0.17%0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


PVH and FNCMX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PVH has higher volatility (27.53%) compared to FNCMX (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PVH dropped -85.13% vs FNCMX's -55.08%.

FNCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PVH and FNCMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer