PVH vs. FNCMX
PVH (PVH Corp.) is a stock, while FNCMX (Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite Index. Over the past 10 years, PVH returned -1.97%/yr vs 19.34%/yr for FNCMX. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PVH vs. FNCMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PVH achieves a 16.73% return, which is significantly higher than FNCMX's 15.79% return. Over the past 10 years, PVH has underperformed FNCMX with an annualized return of -1.97%, while FNCMX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.34% annualized return.
PVH
- 1D
- -20.24%
- 1M
- -11.47%
- YTD
- 16.73%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- -3.10%
- 3Y*
- 0.70%
- 5Y*
- -6.45%
- 10Y*
- -1.97%
FNCMX
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 6.11%
- YTD
- 15.79%
- 6M
- 14.55%
- 1Y
- 38.83%
- 3Y*
- 27.53%
- 5Y*
- 15.16%
- 10Y*
- 19.34%
PVH vs. FNCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PVH PVH Corp. | 16.73% | -36.50% | -13.29% | 73.32% | -33.66% | 13.63% | -10.61% | 13.30% | -32.18% | 52.26% |
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund | 15.79% | 21.11% | 29.48% | 45.13% | -32.40% | 22.21% | 44.57% | 36.63% | -3.07% | 28.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between PVH and FNCMX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2003 | 0.50 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PVH and FNCMX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PVH vs. FNCMX — Risk / Return Rank
PVH
FNCMX
PVH vs. FNCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PVH Corp. (PVH) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PVH | FNCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.42 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 3.03 | -3.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.20 | 11.93 | -12.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PVH | FNCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 | 2.43 | -2.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.68 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.04 | 0.88 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.58 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
PVH vs. FNCMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PVH drawdown since its inception was -85.13%, which is greater than FNCMX's maximum drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PVH and FNCMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PVH | FNCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.13% | -55.08% | -30.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.93% | -13.01% | -18.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.90% | -24.20% | -32.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.58% | -35.64% | -27.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.67% | -35.64% | -47.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.96% | -0.88% | -52.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.03% | -7.86% | -29.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.79% | 3.30% | +13.49% |
Volatility
PVH vs. FNCMX - Volatility Comparison
PVH Corp. (PVH) has a higher volatility of 27.53% compared to Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) at 4.27%. This indicates that PVH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PVH | FNCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.53% | 4.27% | +23.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.58% | 12.14% | +27.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.50% | 16.25% | +33.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.84% | 22.46% | +25.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.12% | 22.05% | +27.07% |
Dividends
PVH vs. FNCMX - Dividend Comparison
PVH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than FNCMX's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund | 0.44% | 0.51% | 0.61% | 0.67% | 0.88% | 0.47% | 0.67% | 4.41% | 1.93% | 0.03% | 1.01% | 1.50% |
PVH PVH Corp. | 0.19% | 0.22% | 0.14% | 0.12% | 0.21% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.11% | 0.17% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PVH and FNCMX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PVH has higher volatility (27.53%) compared to FNCMX (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PVH dropped -85.13% vs FNCMX's -55.08%.
FNCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PVH and FNCMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer