PUTW vs. SPTM
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree CBOE S&P 500 PutWrite Strategy Fund (PUTW) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM).
PUTW and SPTM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PUTW is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the CBOE S&P 500 PutWrite Index. It was launched on Feb 24, 2016. SPTM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Composite 1500 Index. It was launched on Oct 4, 2000. Both PUTW and SPTM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PUTW or SPTM.
Correlation
The correlation between PUTW and SPTM is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PUTW vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PUTW:
2.00
SPTM:
2.15
PUTW:
2.61
SPTM:
2.87
PUTW:
1.42
SPTM:
1.40
PUTW:
2.54
SPTM:
3.21
PUTW:
12.14
SPTM:
13.89
PUTW:
1.58%
SPTM:
1.93%
PUTW:
9.57%
SPTM:
12.49%
PUTW:
-28.40%
SPTM:
-54.80%
PUTW:
-1.84%
SPTM:
-2.75%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PUTW achieves a 18.36% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 24.88% return.
PUTW
18.36%
0.49%
6.08%
18.81%
8.65%
N/A
SPTM
24.88%
-0.47%
9.33%
25.27%
14.44%
12.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PUTW vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PUTW has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PUTW vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree CBOE S&P 500 PutWrite Strategy Fund (PUTW) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PUTW vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
PUTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.64%, more than SPTM's 0.92% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PUTW WisdomTree CBOE S&P 500 PutWrite Strategy Fund | 10.75% | 8.94% | 3.27% | 0.00% | 1.43% | 1.47% | 6.46% | 3.52% | 2.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 0.92% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.71% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% | 2.08% | 1.63% |
Drawdowns
PUTW vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PUTW drawdown since its inception was -28.40%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUTW and SPTM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PUTW vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree CBOE S&P 500 PutWrite Strategy Fund (PUTW) is 3.35%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that PUTW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.