PUBM vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ).
QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PUBM or QQQ.
Correlation
The correlation between PUBM and QQQ is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential
Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer
Try portfolio optimization nowPerformance
PUBM vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PUBM:
-1.16
QQQ:
-0.18
PUBM:
-1.79
QQQ:
-0.10
PUBM:
0.72
QQQ:
0.99
PUBM:
-0.74
QQQ:
-0.18
PUBM:
-1.91
QQQ:
-0.70
PUBM:
34.01%
QQQ:
5.41%
PUBM:
55.79%
QQQ:
21.28%
PUBM:
-88.20%
QQQ:
-82.98%
PUBM:
-88.20%
QQQ:
-21.54%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PUBM achieves a -43.84% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's -17.20% return.
PUBM
-43.84%
-15.56%
-44.14%
-65.18%
N/A
N/A
QQQ
-17.20%
-13.93%
-13.00%
-3.45%
17.38%
15.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PUBM vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PUBM
QQQ
PUBM vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PUBM vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
PUBM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PUBM PubMatic, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ | 0.67% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% | 1.41% |
Drawdowns
PUBM vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PUBM drawdown since its inception was -88.20%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUBM and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PUBM vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM) has a higher volatility of 25.82% compared to Invesco QQQ (QQQ) at 16.25%. This indicates that PUBM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
User Portfolios with PUBM or QQQ
Recent discussions
Dividend Paying Stock Portfolio
4803heights
Filtering portfolio screening columns
Bee Zee
Bonds (BND and/or BNDX) are greatly favored over stocks by the optimizer
I have not seem many orange lines winning against original or benchmark no matter what I do. But the software seems to be doing something when all is stock or stock ETFs. However, Bonds and Stocks don't work well together. The moment I add BND or BNDX, the optimizer puts almost all of the weight in the bonds. I ran out of the free limit of calculations.
Maybe it's a message we all need to hear: invest in bond ETFs. Maybe I'm not using the tool correctly. Maybe there is something wrong with the tool.
I don't know.
-- Fred
Fred