PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PUBM vs. APPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PUBM vs. APPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM) and Digital Turbine, Inc. (APPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PUBM achieves a 35.74% return, which is significantly lower than APPS's 71.00% return.


PUBM

1D
-1.47%
1M
17.69%
YTD
35.74%
6M
32.89%
1Y
1.35%
3Y*
-12.82%
5Y*
-15.78%
10Y*

APPS

1D
-8.06%
1M
132.34%
YTD
71.00%
6M
78.87%
1Y
78.31%
3Y*
-3.11%
5Y*
-33.75%
10Y*
23.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PUBM vs. APPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PUBM
PubMatic, Inc.
35.74%-39.62%-9.93%27.32%-62.38%21.78%-5.06%
APPS
Digital Turbine, Inc.
71.00%195.86%-75.36%-54.99%-75.01%7.83%36.55%

Correlation

The correlation between PUBM and APPS is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020

0.49

The correlation between PUBM and APPS shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PUBM:

$567.32M

APPS:

$1.03B

EPS

PUBM:

-$0.37

APPS:

-$0.27

PS Ratio

PUBM:

2.03

APPS:

1.75

PB Ratio

PUBM:

2.26

APPS:

5.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

PUBM:

$281.67M

APPS:

$555.80M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PUBM:

$178.08M

APPS:

$392.99M

EBITDA (TTM)

PUBM:

$12.80M

APPS:

$80.59M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PUBM vs. APPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PUBM
PUBM Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
PUBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUBM Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PUBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUBM Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

APPS
APPS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
APPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
APPS Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
APPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
APPS Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PUBM vs. APPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM) and Digital Turbine, Inc. (APPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PUBMAPPSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.02

0.74

-0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.59

2.07

-1.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.23

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

1.30

-1.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.08

2.17

-2.08

PUBM vs. APPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PUBM Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the APPS Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PUBM and APPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PUBMAPPSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

0.74

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

-0.31

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

0.07

-0.27

Drawdowns

PUBM vs. APPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PUBM drawdown since its inception was -91.02%, smaller than the maximum APPS drawdown of -98.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUBM and APPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PUBMAPPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.02%

-98.72%

+7.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.06%

-62.60%

+8.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.86%

-89.18%

+15.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.21%

-98.68%

+13.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.78%

-90.98%

+8.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.67%

-77.72%

+7.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.29%

37.43%

-3.14%

Volatility

PUBM vs. APPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PubMatic, Inc. (PUBM) is 14.16%, while Digital Turbine, Inc. (APPS) has a volatility of 41.56%. This indicates that PUBM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PUBMAPPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.16%

41.56%

-27.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.82%

59.35%

-26.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.51%

106.65%

-37.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.39%

109.55%

-43.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.55%

93.38%

-20.83%

Dividends

PUBM vs. APPS - Dividend Comparison

Neither PUBM nor APPS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

PUBM vs. APPS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PubMatic, Inc. and Digital Turbine, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
62.57M
142.55M
(PUBM) Total Revenue
(APPS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PUBM vs. APPS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PubMatic, Inc. and Digital Turbine, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
58.3%
91.1%
Portfolio components
PUBM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PubMatic, Inc. reported a gross profit of 36.47M and revenue of 62.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.3%.

APPS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Digital Turbine, Inc. reported a gross profit of 129.83M and revenue of 142.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.1%.

PUBM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PubMatic, Inc. reported an operating income of -15.27M and revenue of 62.57M, resulting in an operating margin of -24.4%.

APPS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Digital Turbine, Inc. reported an operating income of 10.52M and revenue of 142.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.

PUBM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PubMatic, Inc. reported a net income of -12.51M and revenue of 62.57M, resulting in a net margin of -20.0%.

APPS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Digital Turbine, Inc. reported a net income of -7.34M and revenue of 142.55M, resulting in a net margin of -5.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PUBM and APPS have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APPS has higher volatility (41.56%) compared to PUBM (14.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PUBM dropped -91.02% vs APPS's -98.72%.

APPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PUBM and APPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer