PTSAX vs. TGLMX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Total Return ESG Fund (PTSAX) and TCW Total Return Bond Fund (TGLMX).
PTSAX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on May 1, 1991. TGLMX is managed by TCW. It was launched on Jun 17, 1993.
Performance
PTSAX vs. TGLMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PTSAX vs. TGLMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTSAX PIMCO Total Return ESG Fund | -1.05% | 8.56% | 2.31% | 5.50% | -16.17% | -1.07% | 8.98% | 8.97% | -0.78% | 4.46% |
TGLMX TCW Total Return Bond Fund | 0.57% | 8.99% | 1.82% | 5.05% | -16.59% | -1.05% | 8.32% | 7.28% | 0.80% | 3.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTSAX achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than TGLMX's 0.57% return. Over the past 10 years, PTSAX has outperformed TGLMX with an annualized return of 1.79%, while TGLMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.54% annualized return.
PTSAX
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -3.12%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.08%
- 5Y*
- -0.15%
- 10Y*
- 1.79%
TGLMX
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 5.74%
- 3Y*
- 4.22%
- 5Y*
- -0.02%
- 10Y*
- 1.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PTSAX vs. TGLMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTSAX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than TGLMX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PTSAX vs. TGLMX — Risk / Return Rank
PTSAX
TGLMX
PTSAX vs. TGLMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Total Return ESG Fund (PTSAX) and TCW Total Return Bond Fund (TGLMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTSAX | TGLMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 1.18 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 1.71 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.22 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 2.04 | -0.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.13 | 6.03 | -1.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTSAX | TGLMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 1.18 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | -0.00 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.28 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.40 | +0.69 |
Correlation
The correlation between PTSAX and TGLMX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PTSAX vs. TGLMX - Dividend Comparison
PTSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than TGLMX's 6.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTSAX PIMCO Total Return ESG Fund | 3.60% | 3.87% | 3.89% | 3.32% | 3.68% | 2.96% | 4.60% | 3.48% | 2.56% | 2.03% | 2.96% | 4.71% |
TGLMX TCW Total Return Bond Fund | 6.39% | 7.19% | 6.52% | 6.13% | 3.27% | 2.08% | 3.37% | 4.07% | 3.55% | 2.89% | 4.13% | 2.88% |
Drawdowns
PTSAX vs. TGLMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTSAX drawdown since its inception was -21.12%, smaller than the maximum TGLMX drawdown of -22.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTSAX and TGLMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTSAX | TGLMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.12% | -22.26% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.63% | -3.28% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.12% | -22.17% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.12% | -22.26% | +1.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.12% | -3.38% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.47% | -3.80% | +1.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | 1.11% | +0.08% |
Volatility
PTSAX vs. TGLMX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Total Return ESG Fund (PTSAX) has a higher volatility of 1.95% compared to TCW Total Return Bond Fund (TGLMX) at 1.85%. This indicates that PTSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TGLMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PTSAX | TGLMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.95% | 1.85% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.90% | 2.88% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.84% | 5.02% | -0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.05% | 7.03% | -0.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.05% | 5.57% | -0.52% |