PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTN vs. NBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PTN vs. NBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palatin Technologies, Inc. (PTN) and Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTN achieves a -6.76% return, which is significantly lower than NBR's 86.17% return.


PTN

1D
6.22%
1M
-28.30%
YTD
-6.76%
6M
-34.79%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NBR

1D
5.00%
1M
-3.98%
YTD
86.17%
6M
77.63%
1Y
249.79%
3Y*
2.73%
5Y*
-3.55%
10Y*
-13.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTN vs. NBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PTN
Palatin Technologies, Inc.
-6.76%39.31%
NBR
Nabors Industries Ltd.
86.17%12.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PTN and NBR is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025

0.04

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PTN:

$56.10M

NBR:

$1.44B

EPS

PTN:

-$2.39

NBR:

$15.33

PS Ratio

PTN:

4.19

NBR:

0.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

PTN:

$8.96M

NBR:

$3.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PTN:

$8.90M

NBR:

$661.90M

EBITDA (TTM)

PTN:

-$6.39M

NBR:

$1.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTN vs. NBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTN

NBR
NBR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
NBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
NBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTN vs. NBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palatin Technologies, Inc. (PTN) and Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PTN vs. NBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTNNBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

-0.02

+0.45

Drawdowns

PTN vs. NBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTN drawdown since its inception was -51.79%, smaller than the maximum NBR drawdown of -99.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTN and NBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTNNBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.79%

-99.51%

+47.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.79%

-95.13%

+46.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.72%

-52.74%

+23.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.99%

Volatility

PTN vs. NBR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTNNBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

141.69%

60.57%

+81.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

141.69%

66.40%

+75.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

141.69%

82.09%

+59.60%

Dividends

PTN vs. NBR - Dividend Comparison

Neither PTN nor NBR has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBR
Nabors Industries Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.86%1.39%12.00%3.51%1.46%2.82%
PTN
Palatin Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PTN vs. NBR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Palatin Technologies, Inc. and Nabors Industries Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M202220232024202520260
786.44M
(PTN) Total Revenue
(NBR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PTN and NBR have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTN and NBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer