PTIAX vs. VPLS
PTIAX (Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund) and VPLS (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past year, PTIAX returned 5.91% vs 5.30% for VPLS. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PTIAX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for VPLS.
Performance
PTIAX vs. VPLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTIAX achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly higher than VPLS's 0.80% return.
PTIAX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 5.91%
- 3Y*
- 5.44%
- 5Y*
- 0.99%
- 10Y*
- 2.90%
VPLS
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 5.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTIAX vs. VPLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PTIAX Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund | 1.35% | 6.92% | 3.52% | 2.23% |
VPLS Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF | 0.80% | 7.86% | 2.72% | 2.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTIAX and VPLS is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between PTIAX and VPLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTIAX vs. VPLS — Risk / Return Rank
PTIAX
VPLS
PTIAX vs. VPLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund (PTIAX) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTIAX | VPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.26 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 1.96 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.57 | 6.12 | -0.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTIAX vs. VPLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTIAX drawdown since its inception was -16.90%, which is greater than VPLS's maximum drawdown of -4.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIAX and VPLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTIAX | VPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.90% | -4.17% | -12.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.99% | -2.72% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -1.06% | +0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.43% | -1.01% | -1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.08% | 0.87% | +0.21% |
Volatility
PTIAX vs. VPLS - Volatility Comparison
Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund (PTIAX) has a higher volatility of 1.03% compared to Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS) at 0.96%. This indicates that PTIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTIAX | VPLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | 0.96% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.84% | 2.76% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.93% | 3.61% | +0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 4.59% | +0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.05% | 4.59% | -0.54% |
PTIAX vs. VPLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTIAX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than VPLS's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTIAX vs. VPLS - Dividend Comparison
PTIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.74%, which matches VPLS's 4.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTIAX Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund | 4.74% | 4.68% | 4.44% | 4.03% | 3.96% | 3.01% | 3.86% | 4.11% | 4.47% | 5.51% | 5.49% | 4.87% |
VPLS Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF | 4.75% | 4.78% | 4.52% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, PTIAX and VPLS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PTIAX has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to VPLS (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIAX dropped -16.90% vs VPLS's -4.17%.
PTIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTIAX and VPLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer