PTIAX vs. FTBFX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PTIAX (Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund) and FTBFX (Fidelity Total Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, PTIAX returned 2.89%/yr vs 2.45%/yr for FTBFX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTIAX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FTBFX.

Performance

PTIAX vs. FTBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund (PTIAX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTIAX achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly higher than FTBFX's 0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, PTIAX has outperformed FTBFX with an annualized return of 2.89%, while FTBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.45% annualized return.

PTIAX

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 0.70%
• 6M: 0.73%
• 1Y: 5.54%
• 3Y*: 5.22%
• 5Y*: 0.98%
• 10Y*: 2.89%

FTBFX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 0.36%
• 6M: 0.40%
• 1Y: 4.86%
• 3Y*: 4.76%
• 5Y*: 0.64%
• 10Y*: 2.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTIAX vs. FTBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PTIAX Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund	0.70%	6.92%	3.52%	7.48%	-12.84%	1.15%	5.73%	7.36%	2.01%	7.08%
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund	0.36%	7.50%	2.13%	7.25%	-13.58%	-0.44%	9.34%	9.89%	-0.66%	4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between PTIAX and FTBFX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011	0.77

The correlation between PTIAX and FTBFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (all time) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PTIAX vs. FTBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTIAX

PTIAX Risk / Return Rank: 29
PTIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
PTIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
PTIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
PTIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
PTIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

FTBFX

FTBFX Risk / Return Rank: 25
FTBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FTBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
FTBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FTBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FTBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTIAX vs. FTBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund (PTIAX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PTIAX	FTBFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	1.43	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	2.15	+0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.26	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	1.92	+0.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.94	5.84	+0.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PTIAX vs. FTBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the FTBFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTIAX and FTBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PTIAX	FTBFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	1.43	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	0.11	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	0.52	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.22	0.92	+0.30

Drawdowns

PTIAX vs. FTBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTIAX drawdown since its inception was -16.90%, smaller than the maximum FTBFX drawdown of -18.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIAX and FTBFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTIAX	FTBFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.90%	-18.25%	+1.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.99%	-2.89%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.96%	-5.82%	+0.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.90%	-18.25%	+1.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.90%	-18.25%	+1.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.54%	-1.51%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.44%	-2.32%	-0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.05%	0.95%	+0.10%

Volatility

PTIAX vs. FTBFX - Volatility Comparison

Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund (PTIAX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) have volatilities of 1.40% and 1.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTIAX	FTBFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.40%	1.38%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.80%	2.78%	+0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.03%	3.87%	+0.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.97%	5.67%	-0.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.04%	4.73%	-0.69%

PTIAX vs. FTBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTIAX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FTBFX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTIAX vs. FTBFX - Dividend Comparison

PTIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, more than FTBFX's 4.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund	4.36%	4.36%	4.15%	4.15%	2.54%	1.89%	5.22%	3.03%	3.19%	2.97%	3.61%	3.30%
PTIAX Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund	4.77%	4.68%	4.44%	4.03%	3.96%	3.01%	3.86%	4.11%	4.47%	5.51%	5.49%	4.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTIAX and FTBFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, PTIAX and FTBFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PTIAX or FTBFX?

PTIAX has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to FTBFX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIAX dropped -16.90% vs FTBFX's -18.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PTIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.