PSTQX vs. FTBFX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

PSTQX (PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund - Class R6) and FTBFX (Fidelity Total Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - PSTQX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by PGIM, while FTBFX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, PSTQX returned 2.59%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for FTBFX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSTQX charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FTBFX.

Performance

PSTQX vs. FTBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund - Class R6 (PSTQX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSTQX achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly higher than FTBFX's 0.57% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PSTQX having a 2.59% annualized return and FTBFX not far behind at 2.47%.

PSTQX

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 0.74%
• 6M: 1.09%
• 1Y: 4.76%
• 3Y*: 5.41%
• 5Y*: 2.07%
• 10Y*: 2.59%

FTBFX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: 0.57%
• 6M: 0.50%
• 1Y: 5.75%
• 3Y*: 4.84%
• 5Y*: 0.72%
• 10Y*: 2.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSTQX vs. FTBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PSTQX PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund - Class R6	0.74%	6.75%	4.89%	5.95%	-6.78%	-0.51%	5.60%	6.77%	0.68%	2.25%
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund	0.57%	7.50%	2.13%	7.25%	-13.58%	-0.44%	9.34%	9.89%	-0.66%	4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between PSTQX and FTBFX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.80

The correlation between PSTQX and FTBFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PSTQX vs. FTBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSTQX

PSTQX Risk / Return Rank: 61
PSTQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
PSTQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
PSTQX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
PSTQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
PSTQX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

FTBFX

FTBFX Risk / Return Rank: 24
FTBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
FTBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
FTBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
FTBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
FTBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSTQX vs. FTBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund - Class R6 (PSTQX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSTQX	FTBFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	1.40	+0.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.64	2.10	+1.54
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.25	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.95	2.08	+0.87
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.80	6.41	+4.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSTQX vs. FTBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSTQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the FTBFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSTQX and FTBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSTQX	FTBFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10	1.40	+0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.13	+0.58
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.97	0.52	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.98	0.93	+0.06

Drawdowns

PSTQX vs. FTBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSTQX drawdown since its inception was -10.47%, smaller than the maximum FTBFX drawdown of -18.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSTQX and FTBFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSTQX	FTBFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.47%	-18.25%	+7.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.74%	-2.89%	+1.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.74%	-5.82%	+4.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.47%	-18.25%	+7.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-10.47%	-18.25%	+7.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-1.31%	+0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.32%	-2.32%	+1.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.48%	0.94%	-0.46%

Volatility

PSTQX vs. FTBFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund - Class R6 (PSTQX) is 0.74%, while Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) has a volatility of 1.40%. This indicates that PSTQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSTQX	FTBFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.74%	1.40%	-0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.70%	2.81%	-1.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.23%	3.89%	-1.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.94%	5.67%	-2.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.68%	4.73%	-2.05%

PSTQX vs. FTBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSTQX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FTBFX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSTQX vs. FTBFX - Dividend Comparison

PSTQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, less than FTBFX's 4.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund	4.36%	4.36%	4.15%	4.15%	2.54%	1.89%	5.22%	3.03%	3.19%	2.97%	3.61%	3.30%
PSTQX PGIM Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund - Class R6	4.21%	4.08%	3.62%	2.63%	2.31%	2.08%	2.55%	2.95%	2.89%	2.79%	2.74%	2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSTQX and FTBFX in my portfolio?

PSTQX and FTBFX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSTQX or FTBFX?

FTBFX has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to PSTQX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSTQX dropped -10.47% vs FTBFX's -18.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSTQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.