PSQ vs. IUSV
PSQ (ProShares Short QQQ) and IUSV (iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSQ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%), while IUSV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSQ returned -19.32%/yr vs 12.30%/yr for IUSV. At a correlation of -0.72, they often move in opposite directions. PSQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IUSV.
Performance
PSQ vs. IUSV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSQ achieves a -13.33% return, which is significantly lower than IUSV's 7.71% return. Over the past 10 years, PSQ has underperformed IUSV with an annualized return of -19.32%, while IUSV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.30% annualized return.
PSQ
- 1D
- 3.29%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- -13.33%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- -23.10%
- 3Y*
- -17.43%
- 5Y*
- -13.16%
- 10Y*
- -19.32%
IUSV
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 7.71%
- 6M
- 7.04%
- 1Y
- 20.11%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
PSQ vs. IUSV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | -13.33% | -15.51% | -15.68% | -32.01% | 36.40% | -24.84% | -41.23% | -27.49% | -2.34% | -24.77% |
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF | 7.71% | 12.85% | 12.18% | 21.73% | -5.40% | 25.22% | 1.56% | 31.47% | -9.21% | 15.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSQ and IUSV is -0.58, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006 | -0.72 |
The correlation between PSQ and IUSV shifts across timeframes, from -0.72 (all time) to -0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSQ vs. IUSV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSQ
IUSV
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
PSQ
IUSV
Basic Materials
PSQ
-
IUSV
Communication Services
PSQ
-
IUSV
Consumer Cyclical
PSQ
-
IUSV
Consumer Defensive
PSQ
-
IUSV
Energy
PSQ
-
IUSV
Healthcare
PSQ
-
IUSV
Industrials
PSQ
-
IUSV
Real Estate
PSQ
-
IUSV
Technology
PSQ
-
IUSV
Utilities
PSQ
-
IUSV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSQ vs. IUSV — Risk / Return Rank
PSQ
IUSV
PSQ vs. IUSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSQ | IUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.36 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 3.18 | -4.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.99 | 12.08 | -14.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSQ vs. IUSV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSQ drawdown since its inception was -98.26%, which is greater than IUSV's maximum drawdown of -56.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSQ and IUSV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSQ | IUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.26% | -56.88% | -41.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.95% | -6.36% | -18.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.65% | -17.76% | -31.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.91% | -17.95% | -42.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.98% | -37.54% | -51.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.19% | -1.31% | -96.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.02% | -6.28% | -67.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.74% | 1.67% | +11.07% |
Volatility
PSQ vs. IUSV - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) has a higher volatility of 8.93% compared to iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) at 3.03%. This indicates that PSQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSQ | IUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.93% | 3.03% | +5.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.46% | 7.46% | +7.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.94% | 10.11% | +7.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.72% | 14.53% | +8.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.37% | 17.04% | +5.33% |
PSQ vs. IUSV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSQ vs. IUSV - Dividend Comparison
PSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than IUSV's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF | 1.70% | 1.78% | 2.15% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 1.87% | 2.40% | 2.19% | 2.67% | 1.93% | 4.44% | 7.63% |
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | 5.05% | 4.97% | 7.15% | 6.01% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 1.75% | 0.95% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSQ and IUSV have a correlation of -0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSQ has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to IUSV (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSQ dropped -98.26% vs IUSV's -56.88%.
On 10-year performance, IUSV leads with 12.30% vs -19.32% for PSQ. On fees, IUSV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSV has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IUSV has performed better with a 12.30% return vs -19.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for PSQ.
PSQ has the higher dividend yield at 5.05%, compared with 1.70% for IUSV.
PSQ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while IUSV is Large Cap Value Equities. PSQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%), while IUSV tracks S&P 900 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for PSQ and 0.04% for IUSV.
IUSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs -1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSQ and IUSV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer