PSN vs. LMT
PSN (Parsons Corporation) and LMT (Lockheed Martin Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — PSN in Specialty Industrial Machinery, LMT in Aerospace & Defense. Over the past 5 years, PSN returned 8.31%/yr vs 8.55%/yr for LMT. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PSN vs. LMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSN achieves a -1.88% return, which is significantly lower than LMT's 8.59% return.
PSN
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 21.77%
- YTD
- -1.88%
- 6M
- -28.20%
- 1Y
- -11.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.74%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- —
LMT
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 2.66%
- YTD
- 8.59%
- 6M
- 17.14%
- 1Y
- 10.54%
- 3Y*
- 7.35%
- 5Y*
- 8.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.94%
PSN vs. LMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSN Parsons Corporation | -1.88% | -33.01% | 47.11% | 35.59% | 37.44% | -7.58% | -11.80% | 37.28% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 8.59% | 2.47% | 10.02% | -4.31% | 40.48% | 3.15% | -6.49% | 18.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSN and LMT is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2019 | 0.35 |
The correlation between PSN and LMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PSN:
$2.78
LMT:
$20.61
PSN:
21.78
LMT:
25.18
PSN:
0.79
LMT:
1.61
PSN:
$6.30B
LMT:
$75.12B
PSN:
$1.08B
LMT:
$7.37B
PSN:
$507.45M
LMT:
$8.09B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSN vs. LMT — Risk / Return Rank
PSN
LMT
PSN vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parsons Corporation (PSN) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSN | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.09 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 0.42 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | 1.02 | -1.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSN | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.28 | 0.40 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.38 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.38 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
PSN vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSN drawdown since its inception was -56.99%, smaller than the maximum LMT drawdown of -79.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSN and LMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSN | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.99% | -79.29% | +22.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.41% | -25.15% | -20.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.99% | -31.79% | -25.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.99% | -31.79% | -25.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.48% | -22.79% | -23.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.64% | -26.84% | +10.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.72% | 10.32% | +13.40% |
Volatility
PSN vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison
Parsons Corporation (PSN) has a higher volatility of 13.24% compared to Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) at 5.29%. This indicates that PSN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSN | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.24% | 5.29% | +7.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.34% | 19.59% | +19.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.86% | 26.57% | +16.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.35% | 22.88% | +10.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.96% | 23.70% | +11.26% |
Dividends
PSN vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison
PSN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 2.63% | 2.76% | 2.62% | 2.68% | 2.34% | 2.98% | 2.76% | 2.31% | 3.13% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 2.83% |
PSN Parsons Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PSN vs. LMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Parsons Corporation and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PSN vs. LMT - Profitability Comparison
PSN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parsons Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.08B and revenue of 18.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.5%.
PSN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parsons Corporation reported an operating income of 95.67M and revenue of 1.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.
LMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.06B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.
PSN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parsons Corporation reported a net income of 52.93M and revenue of 1.49B, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.
LMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.49B and revenue of 18.02B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PSN and LMT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSN has higher volatility (13.24%) compared to LMT (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSN dropped -56.99% vs LMT's -79.29%.
LMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSN and LMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer