PSLV vs. CRT
Compare and contrast key facts about Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PSLV or CRT.
Correlation
The correlation between PSLV and CRT is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PSLV vs. CRT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PSLV:
0.66
CRT:
-1.09
PSLV:
1.12
CRT:
-1.67
PSLV:
1.13
CRT:
0.80
PSLV:
0.31
CRT:
-0.65
PSLV:
2.81
CRT:
-1.34
PSLV:
7.23%
CRT:
32.42%
PSLV:
30.82%
CRT:
40.11%
PSLV:
-79.38%
CRT:
-83.46%
PSLV:
-55.31%
CRT:
-62.91%
Fundamentals
PSLV:
$5.30B
CRT:
$58.62M
PSLV:
$0.23
CRT:
$1.13
PSLV:
3.31
CRT:
8.65
PSLV:
0.00
CRT:
0.00
PSLV:
$622.00M
CRT:
$10.57M
PSLV:
$604.69M
CRT:
$13.67M
PSLV:
$1.16B
CRT:
$4.40M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSLV achieves a 22.28% return, which is significantly higher than CRT's -41.31% return. Over the past 10 years, PSLV has outperformed CRT with an annualized return of 5.04%, while CRT has yielded a comparatively lower 1.72% annualized return.
PSLV
22.28%
-4.82%
-1.50%
19.04%
9.50%
5.04%
CRT
-41.31%
-6.63%
-6.04%
-43.44%
15.53%
1.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PSLV vs. CRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PSLV vs. CRT - Dividend Comparison
PSLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.68%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CRT Cross Timbers Royalty Trust | 10.68% | 10.97% | 7.69% | 9.70% | 9.44% | 10.05% | 13.08% | 6.86% | 5.90% | 10.41% | 15.33% | 7.88% |
Drawdowns
PSLV vs. CRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSLV drawdown since its inception was -79.38%, roughly equal to the maximum CRT drawdown of -83.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSLV and CRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PSLV vs. CRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) is 7.42%, while Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that PSLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
PSLV vs. CRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sprott Physical Silver Trust and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities