PSLDX vs. USFR
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX) and WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR).
PSLDX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Aug 31, 2007. USFR is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. It was launched on Feb 4, 2014.
Performance
PSLDX vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PSLDX vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSLDX PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I | -9.19% | 12.26% | 17.15% | 27.92% | -43.18% | 25.85% | 37.80% | 60.43% | -9.31% | 33.07% |
USFR WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 0.93% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 1.98% | -0.03% | 0.56% | 2.02% | 2.01% | 1.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSLDX achieves a -9.19% return, which is significantly lower than USFR's 0.93% return. Over the past 10 years, PSLDX has outperformed USFR with an annualized return of 12.36%, while USFR has yielded a comparatively lower 2.41% annualized return.
PSLDX
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -12.58%
- YTD
- -9.19%
- 6M
- -13.68%
- 1Y
- 3.47%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- 2.64%
- 10Y*
- 12.36%
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- 2.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PSLDX vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSLDX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PSLDX vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
PSLDX
USFR
PSLDX vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX) and WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSLDX | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.20 | 14.37 | -14.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.43 | 42.77 | -42.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 10.64 | -9.57 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 103.73 | -103.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.49 | 661.88 | -661.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSLDX | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | 14.37 | -14.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 8.63 | -8.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 3.00 | -2.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 1.57 | -0.96 |
Correlation
The correlation between PSLDX and USFR is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PSLDX vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
PSLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than USFR's 4.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSLDX PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I | 3.40% | 5.60% | 16.73% | 3.67% | 2.66% | 38.80% | 12.89% | 18.91% | 15.58% | 24.52% | 11.55% | 12.08% |
USFR WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 4.00% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PSLDX vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSLDX drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSLDX and USFR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSLDX | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.25% | -1.36% | -53.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.25% | -0.04% | -19.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.32% | -0.18% | -49.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.32% | -0.80% | -48.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.47% | 0.00% | -18.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.70% | -0.16% | -10.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.30% | 0.01% | +6.29% |
Volatility
PSLDX vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX) has a higher volatility of 7.50% compared to WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.09%. This indicates that PSLDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PSLDX | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.50% | 0.09% | +7.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.03% | 0.19% | +13.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.99% | 0.29% | +23.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.86% | 0.41% | +22.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.31% | 0.81% | +20.50% |