PortfoliosLab logo
PSHZF vs. IWB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PSHZF and IWB is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

PSHZF vs. IWB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pershing Square Holdings Ltd (PSHZF) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%150.00%200.00%250.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
98.60%
208.99%
PSHZF
IWB

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PSHZF:

-0.16

IWB:

0.52

Sortino Ratio

PSHZF:

-0.05

IWB:

0.85

Omega Ratio

PSHZF:

0.99

IWB:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

PSHZF:

-0.16

IWB:

0.53

Martin Ratio

PSHZF:

-0.35

IWB:

2.14

Ulcer Index

PSHZF:

12.03%

IWB:

4.69%

Daily Std Dev

PSHZF:

26.24%

IWB:

19.47%

Max Drawdown

PSHZF:

-56.97%

IWB:

-55.38%

Current Drawdown

PSHZF:

-17.79%

IWB:

-10.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSHZF achieves a -2.05% return, which is significantly higher than IWB's -5.90% return. Over the past 10 years, PSHZF has underperformed IWB with an annualized return of 6.87%, while IWB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.66% annualized return.


PSHZF

YTD

-2.05%

1M

-4.73%

6M

1.95%

1Y

-1.67%

5Y*

20.35%

10Y*

6.87%

IWB

YTD

-5.90%

1M

-3.24%

6M

-4.19%

1Y

10.51%

5Y*

15.77%

10Y*

11.66%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PSHZF vs. IWB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSHZF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PSHZF is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PSHZF is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PSHZF is 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PSHZF is 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PSHZF is 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PSHZF is 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

IWB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IWB is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IWB is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IWB is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IWB is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IWB is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IWB is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PSHZF vs. IWB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pershing Square Holdings Ltd (PSHZF) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for PSHZF, currently valued at -0.16, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
PSHZF: -0.16
IWB: 0.52
The chart of Sortino ratio for PSHZF, currently valued at -0.05, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
PSHZF: -0.05
IWB: 0.85
The chart of Omega ratio for PSHZF, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
PSHZF: 0.99
IWB: 1.12
The chart of Calmar ratio for PSHZF, currently valued at -0.16, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
PSHZF: -0.16
IWB: 0.53
The chart of Martin ratio for PSHZF, currently valued at -0.35, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
PSHZF: -0.35
IWB: 2.14

The current PSHZF Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the IWB Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSHZF and IWB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.16
0.52
PSHZF
IWB

Dividends

PSHZF vs. IWB - Dividend Comparison

PSHZF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than IWB's 1.21% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PSHZF
Pershing Square Holdings Ltd
1.28%1.21%1.12%1.16%0.97%1.13%2.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
1.21%1.14%1.31%1.56%1.09%1.37%1.71%2.06%1.64%1.89%1.95%1.71%

Drawdowns

PSHZF vs. IWB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSHZF drawdown since its inception was -56.97%, roughly equal to the maximum IWB drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSHZF and IWB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-17.79%
-10.19%
PSHZF
IWB

Volatility

PSHZF vs. IWB - Volatility Comparison

Pershing Square Holdings Ltd (PSHZF) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) have volatilities of 14.39% and 14.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
14.39%
14.19%
PSHZF
IWB