PSH.AS vs. FBGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Pershing Square Holdings Ltd (PSH.AS) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX).
FBGRX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 31, 1987.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PSH.AS or FBGRX.
Key characteristics
| PSH.AS | FBGRX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 1.78% | 37.57% |
| 1Y Return | 29.83% | 51.19% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.83% | 7.09% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 22.24% | 18.77% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.33% | 14.18% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.21 | 2.66 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.65 | 3.41 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.23 | 1.47 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.40 | 2.45 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.21 | 13.00 |
| Ulcer Index | 8.52% | 3.97% |
| Daily Std Dev | 22.79% | 19.41% |
| Max Drawdown | -57.31% | -57.42% |
| Current Drawdown | -15.10% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSH.AS and FBGRX is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PSH.AS vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PSH.AS achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 37.57% return. Over the past 10 years, PSH.AS has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 7.33%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.18% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PSH.AS vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pershing Square Holdings Ltd (PSH.AS) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PSH.AS vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison
PSH.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than FBGRX's 5.11% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSH.AS Pershing Square Holdings Ltd | 1.21% | 1.13% | 1.37% | 0.97% | 1.14% | 2.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund | 5.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.09% | 0.22% | 5.07% | 6.08% | 7.80% |
Drawdowns
PSH.AS vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSH.AS drawdown since its inception was -57.31%, roughly equal to the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSH.AS and FBGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PSH.AS vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison
Pershing Square Holdings Ltd (PSH.AS) has a higher volatility of 7.14% compared to Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) at 5.39%. This indicates that PSH.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.