PSET vs. XLG
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG).
PSET and XLG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PSET is a passively managed fund by Principal that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ US Price Setters. It was launched on Mar 21, 2016. XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 10, 2005. Both PSET and XLG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PSET or XLG.
Correlation
The correlation between PSET and XLG is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
PSET vs. XLG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PSET:
1.36
XLG:
2.42
PSET:
1.90
XLG:
3.13
PSET:
1.24
XLG:
1.44
PSET:
2.08
XLG:
3.21
PSET:
7.57
XLG:
13.23
PSET:
2.77%
XLG:
2.75%
PSET:
15.44%
XLG:
15.05%
PSET:
-34.74%
XLG:
-52.39%
PSET:
-2.73%
XLG:
-1.96%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSET achieves a 18.70% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 34.91% return.
PSET
18.70%
0.95%
5.75%
19.31%
13.37%
N/A
XLG
34.91%
2.97%
11.04%
35.23%
18.15%
15.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PSET vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSET has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PSET vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PSET vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison
PSET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, more than XLG's 0.53% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSET Principal Quality ETF | 0.69% | 0.85% | 1.47% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.02% | 1.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF | 0.53% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
PSET vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSET drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSET and XLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PSET vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison
Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) have volatilities of 4.15% and 4.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.