PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSET vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSET vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSET achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 12.26% return. Over the past 10 years, PSET has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 12.71%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 20.44% annualized return.


PSET

1D
0.66%
1M
2.60%
6M
3.83%
YTD
3.11%
1Y
7.37%
3Y*
11.34%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
12.71%
ALL TIME*
12.92%

QQQ

1D
0.65%
1M
-3.45%
6M
10.89%
YTD
12.26%
1Y
24.81%
3Y*
22.29%
5Y*
14.23%
10Y*
20.44%
ALL TIME*
10.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$114.12K$93.60K$180.40K
$30.32B$28.40B$31.45B

PSET vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSET
Principal Quality ETF
3.11%7.27%17.65%24.07%-16.52%29.59%16.20%34.85%-2.29%24.63%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
12.26%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PSET and QQQ is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2016

0.64

The correlation between PSET and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSET vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSET
QQQ

Technology

37.4%
60.9%

Industrials

20.5%
2.7%

Financial Services

13.9%
0.2%

Healthcare

10.9%
3.6%

Communication Services

6.2%
13.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
10.7%

Basic Materials

3.7%
1.0%

Energy

1.2%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
6.3%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Technology

PSET
37.4%
QQQ
60.9%

Industrials

PSET
20.5%
QQQ
2.7%

Financial Services

PSET
13.9%
QQQ
0.2%

Healthcare

PSET
10.9%
QQQ
3.6%

Communication Services

PSET
6.2%
QQQ
13.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PSET
5.0%
QQQ
10.7%

Basic Materials

PSET
3.7%
QQQ
1.0%

Energy

PSET
1.2%
QQQ
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

PSET
1.1%
QQQ
6.3%

Real Estate

PSET

-

QQQ
0.1%

Utilities

PSET

-

QQQ
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSET vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PSET
PSET Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
PSET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSET Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSET Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
PSET Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSET Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PSET vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Quality ETF (PSET) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSETQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.21

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

1.88

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.36

6.00

-4.64

PSET vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSET Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSET and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSET vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSET drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSET and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSETQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.74%

-82.97%

+48.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.94%

-11.96%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.96%

-22.77%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.61%

-35.12%

+9.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.74%

-35.12%

+0.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.69%

+7.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-32.62%

+28.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

3.74%

+0.21%

Volatility

PSET vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Quality ETF (PSET) is 3.22%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 6.87%. This indicates that PSET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSETQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

6.87%

-3.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.10%

16.08%

-5.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.09%

19.38%

-6.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.60%

22.90%

-5.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

22.50%

-4.39%

PSET vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSET has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PSET vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

PSET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, more than QQQ's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSET
Principal Quality ETF
0.69%0.59%0.69%0.85%1.47%0.89%1.09%1.52%1.33%1.02%1.26%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.44%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSET and QQQ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to PSET (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSET dropped -34.74% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 20.44% vs 12.71% for PSET. On fees, PSET is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PSET has been the lower-risk option at 3.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 20.44% return vs 12.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSET is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.

PSET has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.44% for QQQ.

PSET is categorized as Quality Factor, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. PSET tracks NASDAQ US Price Setters, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for PSET and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSET and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer