PSCT vs. OMFL
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL).
PSCT and OMFL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PSCT is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Information Technology Index. It was launched on Apr 7, 2010. OMFL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 OFI Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2017. Both PSCT and OMFL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PSCT or OMFL.
Correlation
The correlation between PSCT and OMFL is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PSCT vs. OMFL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PSCT:
0.05
OMFL:
0.62
PSCT:
0.24
OMFL:
0.91
PSCT:
1.03
OMFL:
1.12
PSCT:
0.07
OMFL:
0.65
PSCT:
0.17
OMFL:
1.92
PSCT:
7.08%
OMFL:
4.54%
PSCT:
24.42%
OMFL:
14.10%
PSCT:
-40.44%
OMFL:
-33.24%
PSCT:
-6.78%
OMFL:
-2.69%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCT achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than OMFL's 8.30% return.
PSCT
0.86%
-2.15%
5.97%
0.65%
8.74%
11.30%
OMFL
8.30%
0.51%
3.83%
8.40%
12.01%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PSCT vs. OMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PSCT and OMFL have an expense ratio of 0.29%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PSCT vs. OMFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PSCT vs. OMFL - Dividend Comparison
PSCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than OMFL's 1.06% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCT Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.08% | 0.22% | 0.47% | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.15% | 0.13% | 0.21% |
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 1.06% | 1.37% | 1.55% | 0.95% | 1.48% | 1.53% | 1.39% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PSCT vs. OMFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCT drawdown since its inception was -40.44%, which is greater than OMFL's maximum drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCT and OMFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PSCT vs. OMFL - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF (PSCT) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) at 4.07%. This indicates that PSCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.