PSCD vs. FHLC
PSCD (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF) and FHLC (Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCD is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 / Consumer Discretionary -SEC, while FHLC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSCD returned 10.45%/yr vs 9.88%/yr for FHLC. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSCD charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FHLC.
Performance
PSCD vs. FHLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCD achieves a 9.26% return, which is significantly higher than FHLC's -1.22% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCD has outperformed FHLC with an annualized return of 10.45%, while FHLC has yielded a comparatively lower 9.88% annualized return.
PSCD
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 8.23%
- YTD
- 9.26%
- 6M
- 7.02%
- 1Y
- 16.06%
- 3Y*
- 10.32%
- 5Y*
- 0.94%
- 10Y*
- 10.45%
FHLC
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 1.34%
- YTD
- -1.22%
- 6M
- -1.95%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- 6.59%
- 5Y*
- 4.42%
- 10Y*
- 9.88%
PSCD vs. FHLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCD Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF | 9.26% | -2.87% | 6.46% | 33.23% | -28.06% | 37.34% | 29.07% | 17.49% | -9.28% | 18.16% |
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF | -1.22% | 15.42% | 2.48% | 2.58% | -5.55% | 20.39% | 18.13% | 21.94% | 4.71% | 23.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCD and FHLC is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.49 |
PSCD vs. FHLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSCD
FHLC
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Technology
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSCD
FHLC
-
Consumer Defensive
PSCD
FHLC
-
Industrials
PSCD
FHLC
Technology
PSCD
FHLC
Real Estate
PSCD
FHLC
-
Communication Services
PSCD
FHLC
-
Basic Materials
PSCD
-
FHLC
-
Energy
PSCD
-
FHLC
-
Financial Services
PSCD
-
FHLC
Healthcare
PSCD
-
FHLC
Utilities
PSCD
-
FHLC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCD vs. FHLC — Risk / Return Rank
PSCD
FHLC
PSCD vs. FHLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF (PSCD) and Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCD | FHLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.22 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 1.72 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.32 | 4.27 | -1.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCD vs. FHLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCD drawdown since its inception was -56.57%, which is greater than FHLC's maximum drawdown of -28.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCD and FHLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCD | FHLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.57% | -28.76% | -27.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.14% | -10.38% | -6.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.93% | -16.87% | -15.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.03% | -17.73% | -22.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.57% | -28.76% | -27.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.30% | -4.36% | +1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.31% | -5.19% | -6.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.93% | 4.19% | +2.74% |
Volatility
PSCD vs. FHLC - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF (PSCD) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) at 4.92%. This indicates that PSCD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCD | FHLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.03% | 4.92% | +1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.83% | 10.46% | +6.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.38% | 14.70% | +9.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.80% | 15.02% | +12.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.10% | 16.85% | +12.25% |
PSCD vs. FHLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCD has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLC's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCD vs. FHLC - Dividend Comparison
PSCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than FHLC's 1.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF | 1.40% | 1.40% | 1.51% | 1.40% | 1.30% | 1.16% | 1.45% | 1.18% | 1.38% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 2.07% |
PSCD Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.13% | 0.94% | 1.28% | 1.09% | 1.60% | 0.57% | 0.56% | 0.91% | 1.39% | 0.97% | 1.07% | 1.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCD and FHLC have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSCD has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to FHLC (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCD dropped -56.57% vs FHLC's -28.76%.
On 10-year performance, PSCD leads with 10.45% vs 9.88% for FHLC. On fees, FHLC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FHLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSCD has performed better with a 10.45% return vs 9.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FHLC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for PSCD.
FHLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 1.13% for PSCD.
PSCD is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while FHLC is Health & Biotech Equities. PSCD tracks S&P Small Cap 600 / Consumer Discretionary -SEC, while FHLC tracks MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for PSCD and 0.08% for FHLC.
FHLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSCD and FHLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer