PortfoliosLab logo
PSA vs. GLPI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PSA and GLPI is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

PSA vs. GLPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Public Storage (PSA) and Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PSA:

0.57

GLPI:

0.54

Sortino Ratio

PSA:

0.98

GLPI:

0.92

Omega Ratio

PSA:

1.12

GLPI:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

PSA:

0.47

GLPI:

0.76

Martin Ratio

PSA:

1.19

GLPI:

2.75

Ulcer Index

PSA:

11.75%

GLPI:

3.88%

Daily Std Dev

PSA:

23.64%

GLPI:

18.53%

Max Drawdown

PSA:

-55.80%

GLPI:

-69.44%

Current Drawdown

PSA:

-16.33%

GLPI:

-10.05%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PSA:

$53.54B

GLPI:

$12.78B

EPS

PSA:

$10.08

GLPI:

$2.83

PE Ratio

PSA:

30.28

GLPI:

16.43

PEG Ratio

PSA:

11.63

GLPI:

8.08

PS Ratio

PSA:

11.30

GLPI:

8.24

PB Ratio

PSA:

10.09

GLPI:

3.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

PSA:

$4.72B

GLPI:

$1.55B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PSA:

$3.45B

GLPI:

$1.44B

EBITDA (TTM)

PSA:

$3.37B

GLPI:

$1.42B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSA achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly higher than GLPI's -3.04% return. Over the past 10 years, PSA has underperformed GLPI with an annualized return of 8.37%, while GLPI has yielded a comparatively higher 9.03% annualized return.


PSA

YTD

1.91%

1M

7.77%

6M

-6.73%

1Y

13.41%

5Y*

15.91%

10Y*

8.37%

GLPI

YTD

-3.04%

1M

-3.57%

6M

-3.59%

1Y

9.90%

5Y*

17.99%

10Y*

9.03%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PSA vs. GLPI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PSA is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PSA is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PSA is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PSA is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PSA is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PSA is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

GLPI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GLPI is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GLPI is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GLPI is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GLPI is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GLPI is 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GLPI is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PSA vs. GLPI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Public Storage (PSA) and Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PSA Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is comparable to the GLPI Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSA and GLPI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PSA vs. GLPI - Dividend Comparison

PSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than GLPI's 6.61% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PSA
Public Storage
3.97%4.01%3.93%7.55%2.14%3.46%3.76%3.95%3.83%3.27%2.62%3.03%
GLPI
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.
6.61%6.31%6.38%5.38%5.96%3.63%6.36%7.95%6.76%7.58%7.84%48.81%

Drawdowns

PSA vs. GLPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSA drawdown since its inception was -55.80%, smaller than the maximum GLPI drawdown of -69.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSA and GLPI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PSA vs. GLPI - Volatility Comparison

Public Storage (PSA) has a higher volatility of 6.59% compared to Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI) at 5.20%. This indicates that PSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PSA vs. GLPI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Public Storage and Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20212022202320242025
1.18B
395.24M
(PSA) Total Revenue
(GLPI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PSA vs. GLPI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Public Storage and Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%85.0%90.0%95.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
72.0%
96.6%
(PSA) Gross Margin
(GLPI) Gross Margin
PSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Public Storage reported a gross profit of 851.34M and revenue of 1.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.0%.

GLPI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of 381.68M and revenue of 395.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 96.6%.

PSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Public Storage reported an operating income of 543.44M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.9%.

GLPI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of 258.83M and revenue of 395.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 65.5%.

PSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Public Storage reported a net income of 407.79M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in a net margin of 34.5%.

GLPI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. reported a net income of 165.18M and revenue of 395.24M, resulting in a net margin of 41.8%.