PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSA vs. GLPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PSA vs. GLPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Public Storage (PSA) and Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSA achieves a 17.55% return, which is significantly higher than GLPI's 4.80% return. Over the past 10 years, PSA has underperformed GLPI with an annualized return of 5.63%, while GLPI has yielded a comparatively higher 10.07% annualized return.


PSA

1D
0.95%
1M
2.24%
YTD
17.55%
6M
10.84%
1Y
3.77%
3Y*
5.79%
5Y*
5.37%
10Y*
5.63%

GLPI

1D
-0.67%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
4.80%
6M
9.12%
1Y
6.43%
3Y*
3.55%
5Y*
5.99%
10Y*
10.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSA vs. GLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSA
Public Storage
17.55%-9.69%2.09%13.60%-20.20%66.63%12.69%8.96%0.62%-2.89%
GLPI
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.
4.80%-0.80%3.95%0.92%13.49%22.10%4.18%42.88%-5.89%29.78%

Correlation

The correlation between PSA and GLPI is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2013

0.43

The correlation between PSA and GLPI shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.56 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

PSA:

$10.84

GLPI:

$4.24

PE Ratio

PSA:

27.87

GLPI:

10.87

PEG Ratio

PSA:

1.68

GLPI:

1.55

PS Ratio

PSA:

10.93

GLPI:

6.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

PSA:

$4.86B

GLPI:

$1.56B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PSA:

$2.95B

GLPI:

$608.86M

EBITDA (TTM)

PSA:

$3.38B

GLPI:

$1.60B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSA vs. GLPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSA
PSA Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
PSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSA Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

GLPI
GLPI Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
GLPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLPI Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GLPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLPI Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSA vs. GLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Public Storage (PSA) and Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSAGLPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.07

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

0.52

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.50

1.29

-0.79

PSA vs. GLPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSA Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the GLPI Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSA and GLPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSAGLPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

0.37

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.30

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.35

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.37

+0.05

Drawdowns

PSA vs. GLPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSA drawdown since its inception was -60.19%, smaller than the maximum GLPI drawdown of -69.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSA and GLPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSAGLPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.19%

-69.44%

+9.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.20%

-12.39%

-3.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.62%

-14.90%

-10.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.93%

-17.12%

-20.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.93%

-69.44%

+31.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.84%

-5.99%

-6.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.78%

-8.30%

-7.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.52%

4.99%

+2.53%

Volatility

PSA vs. GLPI - Volatility Comparison

Public Storage (PSA) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI) at 3.71%. This indicates that PSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSAGLPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.28%

3.71%

+3.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.64%

12.58%

+5.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.59%

17.34%

+5.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.81%

19.76%

+4.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.45%

28.80%

-5.35%

Dividends

PSA vs. GLPI - Dividend Comparison

PSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than GLPI's 6.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLPI
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.
6.77%6.94%6.31%6.38%5.38%5.96%5.33%6.36%7.95%6.76%7.58%7.84%
PSA
Public Storage
3.97%4.62%4.01%3.93%7.55%2.14%3.46%3.76%3.95%3.83%3.27%2.62%

Financials

PSA vs. GLPI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Public Storage and Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
1.22B
356.52M
(PSA) Total Revenue
(GLPI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PSA vs. GLPI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Public Storage and Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
72.1%
0
Portfolio components
PSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Public Storage reported a gross profit of 877.80M and revenue of 1.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.1%.

GLPI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 356.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Public Storage reported an operating income of 474.28M and revenue of 1.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.0%.

GLPI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of 333.35M and revenue of 356.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 93.5%.

PSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Public Storage reported a net income of 529.38M and revenue of 1.22B, resulting in a net margin of 43.5%.

GLPI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. reported a net income of 231.83M and revenue of 356.52M, resulting in a net margin of 65.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PSA and GLPI have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSA has higher volatility (7.28%) compared to GLPI (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSA dropped -60.19% vs GLPI's -69.44%.

GLPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSA and GLPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer