PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRO vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PRO vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PROS Holdings, Inc. (PRO) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PRO

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDA

1D
-3.62%
1M
8.20%
YTD
15.15%
6M
19.59%
1Y
52.10%
3Y*
76.15%
5Y*
65.05%
10Y*
68.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRO vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRO
PROS Holdings, Inc.
0.00%5.87%-43.39%59.89%-29.66%-32.07%-15.27%90.83%18.71%22.91%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
15.15%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between PRO and NVDA is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007

0.34

Over the past year, the correlation between PRO and NVDA has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PRO:

$1.12B

NVDA:

$5.24T

EPS

PRO:

-$0.24

NVDA:

$6.53

PS Ratio

PRO:

3.17

NVDA:

20.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

PRO:

$351.68M

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PRO:

$238.64M

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

PRO:

$3.16M

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRO vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRO

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRO vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PROS Holdings, Inc. (PRO) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PRO vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRONVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

Drawdowns

PRO vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRONVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.21%

Volatility

PRO vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRONVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.80%

Dividends

PRO vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

PRO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
PRO
PROS Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PRO vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PROS Holdings, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
91.68M
81.62B
(PRO) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PRO vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PROS Holdings, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
68.9%
74.9%
Portfolio components
PRO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PROS Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 63.14M and revenue of 91.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.9%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

PRO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PROS Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.87M and revenue of 91.68M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.1%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

PRO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PROS Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -4.25M and revenue of 91.68M, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PRO and NVDA have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRO and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer