PRO vs. NVDA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PROS Holdings, Inc. (PRO) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA).

Performance

PRO vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PROS Holdings, Inc. (PRO) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PRO vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PRO PROS Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	5.87%	-43.39%	59.89%	-29.66%	-32.07%	-15.27%	90.83%	18.71%	22.91%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	-6.48%	38.92%	171.25%	239.02%	-50.26%	125.48%	122.30%	76.94%	-30.82%	81.99%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PRO : $1.12B NVDA : $4.26T
EPS PRO : -$0.24 NVDA : $4.90
PS Ratio PRO : 3.17 NVDA : 19.80
Total Revenue (TTM) PRO : $351.68M NVDA : $215.94B
Gross Profit (TTM) PRO : $238.64M NVDA : $153.46B
EBITDA (TTM) PRO : $3.16M NVDA : $144.55B

Returns By Period

PRO

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVDA

• 1D: 5.59%
• 1M: -1.57%
• YTD: -6.48%
• 6M: -6.52%
• 1Y: 60.95%
• 3Y*: 84.54%
• 5Y*: 66.14%
• 10Y*: 69.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PRO vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 83
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 80
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRO vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PROS Holdings, Inc. (PRO) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRO	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.61	—

Correlation

The correlation between PRO and NVDA is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PRO vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

PRO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRO PROS Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	PRO	NVDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-89.72%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-20.21%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-66.34%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-66.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-15.76%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-36.40%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.99%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PRO	NVDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.46%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	25.91%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	41.44%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	51.74%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	49.85%	—

Financials

PRO vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PROS Holdings, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PRO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PROS Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 63.14M and revenue of 91.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.9%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 51.09B and revenue of 68.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.0%.

PRO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PROS Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.87M and revenue of 91.68M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.1%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 44.30B and revenue of 68.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.0%.

PRO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PROS Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -4.25M and revenue of 91.68M, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 42.96B and revenue of 68.13B, resulting in a net margin of 63.1%.