PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRNT vs. VOOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRNT vs. VOOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRNT achieves a 16.74% return, which is significantly higher than VOOV's 7.94% return.


PRNT

1D
-1.36%
1M
12.63%
YTD
16.74%
6M
17.94%
1Y
25.74%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
-7.15%
10Y*

VOOV

1D
0.52%
1M
2.02%
YTD
7.94%
6M
8.72%
1Y
22.41%
3Y*
15.84%
5Y*
10.81%
10Y*
11.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRNT vs. VOOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRNT
ARK The 3D Printing ETF
16.74%6.70%-8.72%13.37%-40.26%8.99%40.18%13.06%-17.81%18.03%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
7.94%13.10%12.21%22.15%-5.37%24.87%1.23%31.75%-9.09%15.26%

Correlation

The correlation between PRNT and VOOV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2016

0.65

The correlation between PRNT and VOOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRNT vs. VOOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRNT
VOOV

Technology

50.3%
19.0%

Industrials

27.4%
11.0%

Healthcare

13.8%
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
11.1%

Basic Materials

3.0%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.1%
9.5%

Communication Services

-

3.3%

Energy

-

7.6%

Financial Services

-

15.0%

Real Estate

-

3.4%

Utilities

-

4.6%

Technology

PRNT
50.3%
VOOV
19.0%

Industrials

PRNT
27.4%
VOOV
11.0%

Healthcare

PRNT
13.8%
VOOV
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PRNT
5.4%
VOOV
11.1%

Basic Materials

PRNT
3.0%
VOOV
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

PRNT
0.1%
VOOV
9.5%

Communication Services

PRNT

-

VOOV
3.3%

Energy

PRNT

-

VOOV
7.6%

Financial Services

PRNT

-

VOOV
15.0%

Real Estate

PRNT

-

VOOV
3.4%

Utilities

PRNT

-

VOOV
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRNT vs. VOOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRNT
PRNT Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
PRNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRNT Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
PRNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRNT Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

VOOV
VOOV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOOV Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VOOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOOV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRNT vs. VOOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRNTVOOVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

2.29

-1.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.79

3.18

-1.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.41

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

3.63

-2.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.34

13.90

-9.56

PRNT vs. VOOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRNT Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the VOOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRNT and VOOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRNTVOOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

2.29

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

0.75

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.75

-0.63

Drawdowns

PRNT vs. VOOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRNT drawdown since its inception was -66.10%, which is greater than VOOV's maximum drawdown of -37.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRNT and VOOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRNTVOOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.10%

-37.31%

-28.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.22%

-6.27%

-10.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.00%

-17.55%

-14.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.91%

-18.10%

-39.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.12%

-0.13%

-46.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.96%

-3.84%

-28.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.79%

1.64%

+4.15%

Volatility

PRNT vs. VOOV - Volatility Comparison

ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) has a higher volatility of 7.22% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF (VOOV) at 2.07%. This indicates that PRNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRNTVOOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.22%

2.07%

+5.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.73%

7.07%

+9.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.03%

9.82%

+12.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.04%

14.45%

+11.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.73%

16.95%

+9.78%

PRNT vs. VOOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRNT has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOV's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRNT vs. VOOV - Dividend Comparison

PRNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than VOOV's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRNT
ARK The 3D Printing ETF
0.67%0.78%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.07%0.80%2.16%0.01%0.00%
VOOV
Vanguard S&P 500 Value ETF
1.67%1.76%2.10%1.69%2.19%1.87%2.45%2.10%2.65%2.13%2.24%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRNT and VOOV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRNT has higher volatility (7.22%) compared to VOOV (2.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRNT dropped -66.10% vs VOOV's -37.31%.

On 5-year performance, VOOV leads with 10.81% vs -7.15% for PRNT. On fees, VOOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VOOV has been the lower-risk option at 2.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOOV has performed better with a 10.81% return vs -7.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PRNT.

VOOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.67% for PRNT.

PRNT is categorized as Technology Equities, while VOOV is Large Cap Value Equities. PRNT tracks Total 3D-Printing Index, while VOOV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PRNT and 0.10% for VOOV.

VOOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRNT and VOOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer