PRN vs. XLK
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK).
PRN and XLK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PRN is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. It was launched on Oct 12, 2006. XLK is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Technology Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both PRN and XLK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PRN or XLK.
Key characteristics
| PRN | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.64% | 1.09% |
| 1Y Return | 38.68% | 30.99% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 9.06% | 12.59% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 15.86% | 21.02% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 11.50% | 19.86% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.09 | 1.67 |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.52% | 17.86% |
| Max Drawdown | -59.88% | -82.05% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.60% | -7.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRN and XLK is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PRN vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a 10.64% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 1.09% return. Over the past 10 years, PRN has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 11.50%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 19.86% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRN vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.13% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PRN vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PRN vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than XLK's 0.76% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF | 0.37% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.60% | 0.57% | 0.44% | 0.35% | 0.35% |
XLK Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.76% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% | 1.75% | 1.70% |
Drawdowns
PRN vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and XLK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PRN vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) have volatilities of 5.90% and 5.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.