PRN vs. PSCC
PRN (Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF) and PSCC (Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRN is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index, while PSCC is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PRN returned 19.03%/yr vs 6.95%/yr for PSCC. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRN charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCC.
Performance
PRN vs. PSCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a 45.08% return, which is significantly higher than PSCC's 13.60% return. Over the past 10 years, PRN has outperformed PSCC with an annualized return of 19.03%, while PSCC has yielded a comparatively lower 6.95% annualized return.
PRN
- 1D
- -3.57%
- 1M
- 6.97%
- YTD
- 45.08%
- 6M
- 39.29%
- 1Y
- 65.87%
- 3Y*
- 36.27%
- 5Y*
- 20.84%
- 10Y*
- 19.03%
PSCC
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- 6.59%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 11.94%
- 1Y
- 5.58%
- 3Y*
- 1.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.40%
- 10Y*
- 6.95%
PRN vs. PSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF | 45.08% | 13.74% | 30.35% | 37.96% | -25.09% | 25.21% | 36.39% | 34.52% | -16.19% | 22.82% |
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 13.60% | -16.47% | 0.98% | 14.83% | -6.66% | 28.82% | 11.17% | 17.39% | -6.72% | 9.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRN and PSCC is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PRN and PSCC has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PRN vs. PSCC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PRN
PSCC
Industrials
Technology
-
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
PRN
PSCC
Technology
PRN
PSCC
-
Basic Materials
PRN
PSCC
Energy
PRN
PSCC
-
Consumer Cyclical
PRN
PSCC
Financial Services
PRN
PSCC
Communication Services
PRN
-
PSCC
-
Consumer Defensive
PRN
-
PSCC
Healthcare
PRN
-
PSCC
-
Real Estate
PRN
-
PSCC
-
Utilities
PRN
-
PSCC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRN vs. PSCC — Risk / Return Rank
PRN
PSCC
PRN vs. PSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRN | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.07 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.68 | 0.37 | +4.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.34 | 0.64 | +14.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRN vs. PSCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, which is greater than PSCC's maximum drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and PSCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRN | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.88% | -33.61% | -26.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.15% | -15.17% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.78% | -23.36% | -7.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.84% | -23.36% | -11.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.27% | -33.61% | -2.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.57% | -11.31% | +7.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.82% | -5.99% | -4.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.31% | 8.69% | -4.38% |
Volatility
PRN vs. PSCC - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a higher volatility of 12.02% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) at 5.66%. This indicates that PRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRN | PSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.02% | 5.66% | +6.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.35% | 11.53% | +12.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.47% | 16.90% | +13.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.41% | 18.30% | +7.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.38% | 19.33% | +5.05% |
PRN vs. PSCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCC's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRN vs. PSCC - Dividend Comparison
PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than PSCC's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF | 0.08% | 0.17% | 0.39% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.60% | 0.57% | 0.44% |
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 1.72% | 2.35% | 1.88% | 1.49% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 1.77% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRN and PSCC have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRN has higher volatility (12.02%) compared to PSCC (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRN dropped -59.88% vs PSCC's -33.61%.
On 10-year performance, PRN leads with 19.03% vs 6.95% for PSCC. On fees, PSCC is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PSCC has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PRN has performed better with a 19.03% return vs 6.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSCC is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PRN.
PSCC has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.08% for PRN.
PRN is categorized as Momentum, while PSCC is Consumer Staples Equities. PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index, while PSCC tracks S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PRN and 0.29% for PSCC.
PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRN and PSCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer