PRN vs. PSCC
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC).
PRN and PSCC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PRN is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. It was launched on Oct 12, 2006. PSCC is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Small Cap 600 Capped Consumer Staples. It was launched on Apr 7, 2010. Both PRN and PSCC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PRN or PSCC.
Key characteristics
| PRN | PSCC | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 46.59% | 1.37% |
| 1Y Return | 67.69% | 16.40% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 13.60% | 3.46% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 21.38% | 11.13% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 14.46% | 9.79% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.17 | 0.97 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.02 | 1.48 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.52 | 1.18 |
| Calmar Ratio | 5.01 | 1.36 |
| Martin Ratio | 23.74 | 3.47 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.86% | 4.79% |
| Daily Std Dev | 21.38% | 17.19% |
| Max Drawdown | -59.88% | -33.61% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.28% | -1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRN and PSCC is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
PRN vs. PSCC - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a 46.59% return, which is significantly higher than PSCC's 1.37% return. Over the past 10 years, PRN has outperformed PSCC with an annualized return of 14.46%, while PSCC has yielded a comparatively lower 9.79% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRN vs. PSCC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCC's 0.29% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PRN vs. PSCC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PRN vs. PSCC - Dividend Comparison
PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than PSCC's 1.81% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF | 0.30% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.41% | 0.29% | 0.60% | 0.57% | 0.44% | 0.35% | 0.35% |
PSCC Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF | 1.81% | 1.49% | 1.29% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 1.77% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.34% | 1.60% | 0.42% |
Drawdowns
PRN vs. PSCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, which is greater than PSCC's maximum drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and PSCC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PRN vs. PSCC - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) at 5.23%. This indicates that PRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.