PortfoliosLab logo
PRMN vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PRMN and BDGS is -0.18. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

PRMN vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Planrock Market Neutral Income ETF (PRMN) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


PRMN

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BDGS

YTD

2.08%

1M

1.96%

6M

2.66%

1Y

16.98%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Bridges Capital Tactical ETF

PRMN vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRMN has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PRMN vs. BDGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRMN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PRMN is 22
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PRMN is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PRMN is 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PRMN is 11
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PRMN is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PRMN is 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BDGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDGS is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDGS is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PRMN vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Planrock Market Neutral Income ETF (PRMN) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

PRMN vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

PRMN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%.


TTM20242023
PRMN
Planrock Market Neutral Income ETF
4.29%4.46%0.00%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
1.77%1.81%0.84%

Drawdowns

PRMN vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

PRMN vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...