PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PRMN vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PRMN and BDGS is -0.11. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


-0.50.00.51.0-0.1

Performance

PRMN vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Planrock Market Neutral Income ETF (PRMN) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-1.70%
8.99%
PRMN
BDGS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PRMN:

-0.25

BDGS:

3.97

Sortino Ratio

PRMN:

-0.30

BDGS:

7.04

Omega Ratio

PRMN:

0.95

BDGS:

2.23

Calmar Ratio

PRMN:

-0.33

BDGS:

8.70

Martin Ratio

PRMN:

-0.68

BDGS:

38.12

Ulcer Index

PRMN:

3.18%

BDGS:

0.55%

Daily Std Dev

PRMN:

8.68%

BDGS:

5.24%

Max Drawdown

PRMN:

-6.50%

BDGS:

-5.38%

Current Drawdown

PRMN:

-6.50%

BDGS:

-0.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRMN achieves a -1.20% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's 2.62% return.


PRMN

YTD

-1.20%

1M

-1.21%

6M

-1.79%

1Y

-2.47%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BDGS

YTD

2.62%

1M

0.22%

6M

9.20%

1Y

20.60%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PRMN vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRMN has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


PRMN
Planrock Market Neutral Income ETF
Expense ratio chart for PRMN: current value at 1.30% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.30%
Expense ratio chart for BDGS: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PRMN vs. BDGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRMN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PRMN is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PRMN is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PRMN is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PRMN is 44
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PRMN is 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PRMN is 44
Martin Ratio Rank

BDGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDGS is 9898
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PRMN vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Planrock Market Neutral Income ETF (PRMN) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PRMN, currently valued at -0.25, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.253.97
The chart of Sortino ratio for PRMN, currently valued at -0.30, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00-0.307.04
The chart of Omega ratio for PRMN, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.000.952.23
The chart of Calmar ratio for PRMN, currently valued at -0.33, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.338.70
The chart of Martin ratio for PRMN, currently valued at -0.68, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-0.6838.12
PRMN
BDGS

The current PRMN Sharpe Ratio is -0.25, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 3.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRMN and BDGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.00Dec 22Dec 29Jan 05Jan 12Jan 19Jan 26Feb 02Feb 09Feb 16
-0.25
3.97
PRMN
BDGS

Dividends

PRMN vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

PRMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than BDGS's 1.76% yield.


TTM20242023
PRMN
Planrock Market Neutral Income ETF
4.51%4.46%0.00%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
1.76%1.81%0.84%

Drawdowns

PRMN vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRMN drawdown since its inception was -6.50%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRMN and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-6.50%
-0.09%
PRMN
BDGS

Volatility

PRMN vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Planrock Market Neutral Income ETF (PRMN) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 0.62%. This indicates that PRMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.73%
0.62%
PRMN
BDGS
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab