PRIW.L vs. VEVE.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIW.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VEVE.L).
PRIW.L and VEVE.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PRIW.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi Luxembourg S.A. that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Jan 30, 2019. VEVE.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Sep 30, 2014. Both PRIW.L and VEVE.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PRIW.L or VEVE.L.
Key characteristics
| PRIW.L | VEVE.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 18.73% | 18.23% |
| 1Y Return | 23.59% | 25.35% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.06% | 8.99% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.97% | 12.56% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.31 | 2.54 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.22 | 3.55 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.44 | 1.49 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.69 | 4.06 |
| Martin Ratio | 16.43 | 17.70 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.43% | 1.42% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.12% | 9.87% |
| Max Drawdown | -23.28% | -25.52% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRIW.L and VEVE.L is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PRIW.L vs. VEVE.L - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PRIW.L having a 18.73% return and VEVE.L slightly lower at 18.23%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRIW.L vs. VEVE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRIW.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VEVE.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PRIW.L vs. VEVE.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIW.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VEVE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PRIW.L vs. VEVE.L - Dividend Comparison
PRIW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VEVE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRIW.L Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (D) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.89% | 1.34% | 1.48% | 1.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEVE.L Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing | 1.18% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 1.45% | 1.64% | 1.96% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 1.85% | 2.04% | 0.29% |
Drawdowns
PRIW.L vs. VEVE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRIW.L drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, smaller than the maximum VEVE.L drawdown of -25.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRIW.L and VEVE.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PRIW.L vs. VEVE.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIW.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VEVE.L) have volatilities of 2.80% and 2.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.