PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRISX vs. PRGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRISX vs. PRGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund (PRISX) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRISX achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than PRGTX's 23.62% return. Over the past 10 years, PRISX has underperformed PRGTX with an annualized return of 15.83%, while PRGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.34% annualized return.


PRISX

1D
0.72%
1M
2.89%
6M
9.60%
YTD
8.91%
1Y
19.52%
3Y*
23.21%
5Y*
13.68%
10Y*
15.83%
ALL TIME*
10.45%

PRGTX

1D
5.19%
1M
-5.99%
6M
20.57%
YTD
23.62%
1Y
40.50%
3Y*
30.64%
5Y*
6.46%
10Y*
17.34%
ALL TIME*
11.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PRISX vs. PRGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRISX
T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund
8.91%18.75%30.87%14.95%-10.99%37.83%5.65%32.84%-10.12%19.17%
PRGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund
23.62%27.28%33.12%55.92%-55.53%8.85%75.77%34.22%-10.07%47.09%

Correlation

The correlation between PRISX and PRGTX is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between PRISX and PRGTX has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRISX vs. PRGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRISX
PRISX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PRISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRISX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PRISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRISX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

PRGTX
PRGTX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PRGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRISX vs. PRGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund (PRISX) and T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRISXPRGTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.23

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

1.99

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.38

6.74

-3.36

PRISX vs. PRGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRISX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the PRGTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRISX and PRGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRISX vs. PRGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRISX drawdown since its inception was -67.34%, smaller than the maximum PRGTX drawdown of -71.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRISX and PRGTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRISXPRGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.34%

-71.18%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.92%

-18.50%

+4.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.06%

-26.67%

+8.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.95%

-65.29%

+38.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.86%

-65.29%

+22.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-14.26%

+13.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.20%

-21.45%

+10.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.98%

5.45%

-0.47%

Volatility

PRISX vs. PRGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund (PRISX) is 4.63%, while T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) has a volatility of 11.71%. This indicates that PRISX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRISXPRGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

11.71%

-7.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.06%

25.46%

-13.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.08%

29.02%

-12.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.04%

32.66%

-12.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.71%

28.83%

-7.12%

PRISX vs. PRGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRISX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than PRGTX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRISX vs. PRGTX - Dividend Comparison

PRISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, while PRGTX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.28%27.71%5.05%0.15%24.67%15.81%9.46%10.03%
PRISX
T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund
6.31%6.87%8.74%2.00%2.08%3.00%10.22%6.14%11.97%4.68%1.00%3.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRISX and PRGTX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRGTX has higher volatility (11.71%) compared to PRISX (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRISX dropped -67.34% vs PRGTX's -71.18%.

PRGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRISX and PRGTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer