PRHSX vs. ONEQ

In the year-to-date period, PRHSX achieves a 4.25% return, which is significantly higher than ONEQ's -2.37% return. Over the past 10 years, PRHSX has underperformed ONEQ with an annualized return of 0.72%, while ONEQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.42% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

PRHSX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund (PRHSX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PRHSX Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the ONEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRHSX and ONEQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PRHSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than ONEQ's 0.67% yield.

The maximum PRHSX drawdown since its inception was -47.79%, smaller than the maximum ONEQ drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRHSX and ONEQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund (PRHSX) is NaN%, while Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Tracking Stock (ONEQ) has a volatility of NaN%. This indicates that PRHSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.