PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRGFX vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRGFX vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund (PRGFX) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRGFX achieves a 6.97% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return. Over the past 10 years, PRGFX has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 16.06%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.77% annualized return.


PRGFX

1D
-0.44%
1M
6.84%
YTD
6.97%
6M
6.21%
1Y
23.10%
3Y*
24.84%
5Y*
10.81%
10Y*
16.06%

SCHD

1D
0.00%
1M
2.70%
YTD
19.01%
6M
18.63%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRGFX vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRGFX
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund
6.97%15.64%38.36%45.33%-40.12%19.86%36.92%30.83%-1.04%33.57%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.01%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between PRGFX and SCHD is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between PRGFX and SCHD has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRGFX vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRGFX
PRGFX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
PRGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRGFX vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund (PRGFX) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRGFXSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.45

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

5.91

-4.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.21

14.53

-10.32

PRGFX vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRGFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRGFX and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRGFXSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

2.49

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.58

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.77

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.86

-0.30

Drawdowns

PRGFX vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRGFX drawdown since its inception was -54.01%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGFX and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRGFXSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.01%

-33.37%

-20.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.02%

-4.61%

-13.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.69%

-16.13%

-6.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.44%

-16.85%

-29.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.44%

-33.37%

-13.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-1.40%

+0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.67%

-3.32%

-7.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.63%

1.88%

+3.75%

Volatility

PRGFX vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund (PRGFX) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.66%. This indicates that PRGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRGFXSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

2.66%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.90%

7.66%

+4.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.82%

10.96%

+4.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.11%

14.38%

+8.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.10%

16.72%

+5.38%

PRGFX vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRGFX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRGFX vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

PRGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.70%, more than SCHD's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRGFX
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock Fund
12.70%13.58%13.26%3.34%3.55%9.34%3.51%1.81%9.09%13.57%2.22%7.23%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.26%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRGFX and SCHD have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRGFX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRGFX dropped -54.01% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRGFX and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer