PortfoliosLab logo
PRG vs. WM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PRG and WM is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

PRG vs. WM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PRG:

-0.38

WM:

0.61

Sortino Ratio

PRG:

-0.17

WM:

0.93

Omega Ratio

PRG:

0.97

WM:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

PRG:

-0.30

WM:

1.02

Martin Ratio

PRG:

-0.81

WM:

2.31

Ulcer Index

PRG:

23.46%

WM:

5.28%

Daily Std Dev

PRG:

52.42%

WM:

20.02%

Max Drawdown

PRG:

-80.87%

WM:

-77.85%

Current Drawdown

PRG:

-56.94%

WM:

-1.72%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PRG:

$1.13B

WM:

$93.66B

EPS

PRG:

$4.87

WM:

$6.63

PE Ratio

PRG:

5.73

WM:

35.11

PS Ratio

PRG:

0.45

WM:

4.09

PB Ratio

PRG:

1.72

WM:

10.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

PRG:

$2.51B

WM:

$22.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PRG:

$1.25B

WM:

$8.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

PRG:

$1.49B

WM:

$6.60B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRG achieves a -33.64% return, which is significantly lower than WM's 15.77% return. Over the past 10 years, PRG has underperformed WM with an annualized return of -0.18%, while WM has yielded a comparatively higher 19.08% annualized return.


PRG

YTD

-33.64%

1M

9.80%

6M

-41.33%

1Y

-19.26%

5Y*

0.39%

10Y*

-0.18%

WM

YTD

15.77%

1M

1.47%

6M

4.59%

1Y

11.65%

5Y*

20.87%

10Y*

19.08%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PRG vs. WM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PRG is 3030
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PRG is 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PRG is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PRG is 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PRG is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PRG is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

WM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WM is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WM is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WM is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WM is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WM is 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WM is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PRG vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PRG Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the WM Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRG and WM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PRG vs. WM - Dividend Comparison

PRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than WM's 1.32% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PRG
PROG Holdings, Inc.
1.76%1.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.26%0.25%0.30%0.28%0.32%0.42%0.28%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
1.32%1.49%1.56%1.66%1.38%1.85%1.80%2.09%1.97%2.31%2.89%2.92%

Drawdowns

PRG vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRG drawdown since its inception was -80.87%, roughly equal to the maximum WM drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRG and WM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PRG vs. WM - Volatility Comparison

PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG) has a higher volatility of 12.15% compared to Waste Management, Inc. (WM) at 3.87%. This indicates that PRG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PRG vs. WM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PROG Holdings, Inc. and Waste Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
684.09M
6.02B
(PRG) Total Revenue
(WM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PRG vs. WM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PROG Holdings, Inc. and Waste Management, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
31.8%
39.4%
(PRG) Gross Margin
(WM) Gross Margin
PRG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PROG Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 217.52M and revenue of 684.09M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.8%.

WM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Waste Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.37B and revenue of 6.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.

PRG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PROG Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 56.32M and revenue of 684.09M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.

WM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Waste Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.01B and revenue of 6.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.8%.

PRG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PROG Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 34.72M and revenue of 684.09M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.

WM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Waste Management, Inc. reported a net income of 637.00M and revenue of 6.02B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.