PRG vs. WM
PRG (PROG Holdings, Inc.) and WM (Waste Management, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — PRG in Rental & Leasing Services, WM in Waste Management. Over the past 10 years, PRG returned 8.74%/yr vs 15.16%/yr for WM. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PRG vs. WM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRG achieves a 50.60% return, which is significantly higher than WM's 3.97% return. Over the past 10 years, PRG has underperformed WM with an annualized return of 8.74%, while WM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.16% annualized return.
PRG
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- 6M
- 36.90%
- YTD
- 50.60%
- 1Y
- 46.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.74%
- 5Y*
- 0.90%
- 10Y*
- 8.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.88%
WM
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- 6M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 3.97%
- 1Y
- 0.57%
- 3Y*
- 13.43%
- 5Y*
- 10.57%
- 10Y*
- 15.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $25.64M | $22.44M | $21.41M | |
| $446.41M | $426.54M | $482.07M |
PRG vs. WM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRG PROG Holdings, Inc. | 50.60% | -28.95% | 38.41% | 83.01% | -62.56% | -16.26% | 11.71% | 36.15% | 5.81% | 24.96% |
WM Waste Management, Inc. | 3.97% | 10.50% | 14.28% | 16.20% | -4.49% | 43.82% | 5.46% | 30.45% | 5.32% | 24.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRG and WM is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 1991 | 0.16 |
The correlation between PRG and WM shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.23 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PRG:
$1.76B
WM:
$90.56B
PRG:
$3.61
WM:
$7.06
PRG:
12.20
WM:
32.09
PRG:
1.14
WM:
2.62
PRG:
0.72
WM:
3.57
PRG:
2.23
WM:
9.20
PRG:
$2.48B
WM:
$25.67B
PRG:
$893.15M
WM:
$3.73B
PRG:
$981.94M
WM:
$6.62B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRG vs. WM — Risk / Return Rank
PRG
WM
PRG vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRG | WM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.02 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 0.03 | +1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.66 | 0.06 | +2.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRG vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRG drawdown since its inception was -80.87%, roughly equal to the maximum WM drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRG and WM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRG | WM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.87% | -77.85% | -3.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.21% | -16.70% | -14.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.86% | -18.14% | -33.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.96% | -18.14% | -55.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.87% | -30.07% | -50.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.58% | -7.33% | -23.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.44% | -17.64% | -10.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.34% | 7.86% | +7.48% |
Volatility
PRG vs. WM - Volatility Comparison
PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG) has a higher volatility of 10.69% compared to Waste Management, Inc. (WM) at 8.87%. This indicates that PRG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRG | WM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.69% | 8.87% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.70% | 15.76% | +22.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.91% | 20.33% | +25.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.93% | 19.01% | +31.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.90% | 19.73% | +30.17% |
Dividends
PRG vs. WM - Dividend Comparison
PRG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than WM's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRG PROG Holdings, Inc. | 1.23% | 1.76% | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.26% | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.28% | 0.32% | 0.42% |
WM Waste Management, Inc. | 1.56% | 1.50% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 1.38% | 1.85% | 1.80% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 2.31% | 2.89% |
Financials
PRG vs. WM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PROG Holdings, Inc. and Waste Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PRG vs. WM - Profitability Comparison
PRG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PROG Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 217.34M and revenue of 564.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.5%.
WM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of -2.53B and revenue of 6.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -37.9%.
PRG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PROG Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 73.93M and revenue of 564.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.
WM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.25B and revenue of 6.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.8%.
PRG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, PROG Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 37.03M and revenue of 564.80M, resulting in a net margin of 6.6%.
WM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a net income of 785.00M and revenue of 6.68B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PRG and WM have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRG has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to WM (8.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRG dropped -80.87% vs WM's -77.85%.
PRG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRG and WM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer