PRF vs. PWB
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB).
PRF and PWB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PRF is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the FTSE RAFI US 1000 Index. It was launched on Dec 19, 2005. PWB is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2005. Both PRF and PWB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PRF or PWB.
Correlation
The correlation between PRF and PWB is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PRF vs. PWB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PRF:
0.36
PWB:
0.63
PRF:
0.61
PWB:
1.01
PRF:
1.09
PWB:
1.14
PRF:
0.38
PWB:
0.66
PRF:
1.55
PWB:
2.43
PRF:
3.84%
PWB:
6.03%
PRF:
16.69%
PWB:
23.29%
PRF:
-60.35%
PWB:
-52.57%
PRF:
-8.67%
PWB:
-11.07%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PRF having a -3.34% return and PWB slightly higher at -3.23%. Over the past 10 years, PRF has underperformed PWB with an annualized return of 9.87%, while PWB has yielded a comparatively higher 12.97% annualized return.
PRF
-3.34%
-4.57%
-3.42%
6.30%
15.86%
9.87%
PWB
-3.23%
0.13%
-1.64%
13.86%
15.30%
12.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRF vs. PWB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRF has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PWB's 0.56% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PRF vs. PWB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PRF
PWB
PRF vs. PWB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) and Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PRF vs. PWB - Dividend Comparison
PRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, more than PWB's 0.07% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRF Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF | 1.92% | 1.78% | 1.84% | 2.01% | 1.58% | 1.97% | 1.99% | 2.25% | 1.58% | 2.17% | 2.25% | 1.73% |
PWB Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.37% | 0.31% | 0.03% | 0.21% | 0.58% | 0.97% | 0.54% | 0.82% | 0.67% | 0.43% |
Drawdowns
PRF vs. PWB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRF drawdown since its inception was -60.35%, which is greater than PWB's maximum drawdown of -52.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRF and PWB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PRF vs. PWB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) is 12.32%, while Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) has a volatility of 15.77%. This indicates that PRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.