PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRCT vs. NVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PRCT vs. NVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation (PRCT) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRCT achieves a -32.55% return, which is significantly lower than NVO's 0.24% return.


PRCT

1D
1.58%
1M
-17.45%
6M
-32.27%
YTD
-32.55%
1Y
-62.54%
3Y*
-16.54%
5Y*
10Y*

NVO

1D
-0.40%
1M
12.31%
6M
-14.80%
YTD
0.24%
1Y
-25.17%
3Y*
-12.72%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
8.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRCT vs. NVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PRCT
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation
-32.55%-60.93%92.13%0.89%66.09%-28.54%
NVO
Novo Nordisk A/S
0.24%-39.22%-15.93%54.84%22.66%11.97%

Correlation

The correlation between PRCT and NVO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2021

0.19

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PRCT:

$1.21B

NVO:

$218.99B

EPS

PRCT:

-$2.76

NVO:

DKK 27.42

PS Ratio

PRCT:

2.45

NVO:

4.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

PRCT:

$322.02M

NVO:

DKK 327.80B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PRCT:

$206.01M

NVO:

DKK 268.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

PRCT:

-$90.33M

NVO:

DKK 181.54B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRCT vs. NVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRCT
PRCT Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
PRCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRCT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
PRCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRCT Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

NVO
NVO Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
NVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVO Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
NVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVO Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRCT vs. NVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation (PRCT) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRCTNVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

0.94

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

-0.51

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.28

-0.80

-0.49

PRCT vs. NVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRCT Sharpe Ratio is -1.00, which is lower than the NVO Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRCT and NVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRCT vs. NVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRCT drawdown since its inception was -80.14%, which is greater than NVO's maximum drawdown of -74.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRCT and NVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRCTNVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.14%

-74.70%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.12%

-49.17%

-17.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-80.14%

-74.70%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.66%

-64.19%

-14.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.61%

-17.87%

-14.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.70%

31.54%

+17.16%

Volatility

PRCT vs. NVO - Volatility Comparison

PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation (PRCT) has a higher volatility of 22.01% compared to Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) at 8.73%. This indicates that PRCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRCTNVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.01%

8.73%

+13.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.97%

37.44%

+11.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.92%

51.74%

+11.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.56%

38.53%

+27.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.56%

32.60%

+32.96%

Dividends

PRCT vs. NVO - Dividend Comparison

PRCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVO
Novo Nordisk A/S
3.66%3.31%1.68%1.00%1.20%1.35%1.87%2.14%1.45%1.52%2.87%0.92%
PRCT
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PRCT vs. NVO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation and Novo Nordisk A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
83.13M
96.82B
(PRCT) Total Revenue
(NVO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. PRCT values in USD, NVO values in DKK

PRCT vs. NVO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation and Novo Nordisk A/S over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
64.9%
86.0%
Portfolio components
PRCT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation reported a gross profit of 53.95M and revenue of 83.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.9%.

NVO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Novo Nordisk A/S reported a gross profit of 83.23B and revenue of 96.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.0%.

PRCT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation reported an operating income of -32.61M and revenue of 83.13M, resulting in an operating margin of -39.2%.

NVO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Novo Nordisk A/S reported an operating income of 59.62B and revenue of 96.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 61.6%.

PRCT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation reported a net income of -31.64M and revenue of 83.13M, resulting in a net margin of -38.1%.

NVO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Novo Nordisk A/S reported a net income of 48.56B and revenue of 96.82B, resulting in a net margin of 50.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PRCT and NVO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRCT has higher volatility (22.01%) compared to NVO (8.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRCT dropped -80.14% vs NVO's -74.70%.

NVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.49 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRCT and NVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer