PRCT vs. FSLEX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation (PRCT) and Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund (FSLEX).

FSLEX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 29, 1989.

Performance

PRCT vs. FSLEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation (PRCT) and Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund (FSLEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PRCT vs. FSLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PRCT PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation	-20.50%	-60.93%	92.13%	0.89%	66.09%	-40.37%
FSLEX Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund	-3.79%	20.38%	20.01%	26.29%	-26.05%	7.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRCT achieves a -20.50% return, which is significantly lower than FSLEX's -3.79% return.

PRCT

• 1D: -2.11%
• 1M: 10.22%
• YTD: -20.50%
• 6M: -29.92%
• 1Y: -57.07%
• 3Y*: -4.15%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FSLEX

• 1D: -1.41%
• 1M: -10.23%
• YTD: -3.79%
• 6M: -3.23%
• 1Y: 26.76%
• 3Y*: 17.00%
• 5Y*: 9.21%
• 10Y*: 12.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PRCT vs. FSLEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRCT

PRCT Risk / Return Rank: 7
PRCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PRCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
PRCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7
PRCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
PRCT Martin Ratio Rank: 12

FSLEX

FSLEX Risk / Return Rank: 74
FSLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FSLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FSLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FSLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FSLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRCT vs. FSLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation (PRCT) and Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund (FSLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRCT	FSLEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.97	1.22	-2.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.61	1.82	-3.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.25	-0.43
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.90	1.76	-2.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.42	7.52	-8.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRCT vs. FSLEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRCT Sharpe Ratio is -0.97, which is lower than the FSLEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRCT and FSLEX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRCT	FSLEX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.97	1.22	-2.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.17	0.32	-0.49

Correlation

The correlation between PRCT and FSLEX is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PRCT vs. FSLEX - Dividend Comparison

PRCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSLEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRCT PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FSLEX Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund	0.38%	0.37%	0.41%	0.39%	0.69%	7.74%	6.41%	2.17%	6.39%	6.19%	1.29%	3.01%

Drawdowns

PRCT vs. FSLEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRCT drawdown since its inception was -77.18%, which is greater than FSLEX's maximum drawdown of -50.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRCT and FSLEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRCT	FSLEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.18%	-50.21%	-26.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.12%	-13.76%	-51.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.67%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-74.85%	-11.41%	-63.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.01%	-13.99%	-16.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.98%	3.22%	+37.76%

Volatility

PRCT vs. FSLEX - Volatility Comparison

PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation (PRCT) has a higher volatility of 21.09% compared to Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund (FSLEX) at 6.22%. This indicates that PRCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRCT	FSLEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.09%	6.22%	+14.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.70%	12.26%	+32.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.84%	22.17%	+36.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	64.84%	20.57%	+44.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	64.84%	21.39%	+43.45%