PRCT vs. FSLEX
PRCT (PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation) is a stock, while FSLEX (Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund) is Alternative Energy Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 3 years, PRCT returned -6.27%/yr vs 23.48%/yr for FSLEX. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PRCT vs. FSLEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRCT achieves a -14.94% return, which is significantly lower than FSLEX's 15.18% return.
PRCT
- 1D
- -3.95%
- 1M
- 8.65%
- YTD
- -14.94%
- 6M
- -9.38%
- 1Y
- -53.81%
- 3Y*
- -6.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSLEX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 2.50%
- YTD
- 15.18%
- 6M
- 15.67%
- 1Y
- 34.86%
- 3Y*
- 23.48%
- 5Y*
- 12.05%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
PRCT vs. FSLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRCT PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation | -14.94% | -60.93% | 92.13% | 0.89% | 66.09% | -40.37% |
FSLEX Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund | 15.18% | 20.38% | 20.01% | 26.29% | -26.05% | 7.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRCT and FSLEX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021 | 0.32 |
The correlation between PRCT and FSLEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRCT vs. FSLEX — Risk / Return Rank
PRCT
FSLEX
PRCT vs. FSLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation (PRCT) and Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund (FSLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRCT | FSLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | 2.16 | -3.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | 2.87 | -4.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.36 | -0.52 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 3.02 | -3.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | 12.11 | -13.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRCT | FSLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 | 2.16 | -3.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.14 | 0.35 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
PRCT vs. FSLEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRCT drawdown since its inception was -78.17%, which is greater than FSLEX's maximum drawdown of -50.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRCT and FSLEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRCT | FSLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.17% | -50.21% | -27.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -66.63% | -11.41% | -55.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.17% | -24.04% | -54.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.09% | -0.41% | -72.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.63% | -13.93% | -17.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.01% | 2.84% | +45.17% |
Volatility
PRCT vs. FSLEX - Volatility Comparison
PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation (PRCT) has a higher volatility of 20.61% compared to Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund (FSLEX) at 4.96%. This indicates that PRCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRCT | FSLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.61% | 4.96% | +15.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.31% | 12.55% | +35.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.92% | 16.32% | +43.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.87% | 20.66% | +44.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.87% | 21.47% | +43.40% |
Dividends
PRCT vs. FSLEX - Dividend Comparison
PRCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSLEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSLEX Fidelity Environment and Alternative Energy Fund | 1.57% | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.39% | 0.69% | 7.74% | 6.41% | 2.17% | 6.39% | 6.19% | 1.29% | 3.01% |
PRCT PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRCT and FSLEX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRCT has higher volatility (20.61%) compared to FSLEX (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRCT dropped -78.17% vs FSLEX's -50.21%.
FSLEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRCT and FSLEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer