PRAP.DE vs. CSPX.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF (PRAP.DE) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS).
PRAP.DE and CSPX.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PRAP.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi Luxembourg S.A. that tracks the performance of the Solactive USD Investment Grade Corporate. It was launched on Jan 15, 2020. CSPX.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 19, 2010. Both PRAP.DE and CSPX.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PRAP.DE or CSPX.AS.
Correlation
The correlation between PRAP.DE and CSPX.AS is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PRAP.DE vs. CSPX.AS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PRAP.DE:
1.26
CSPX.AS:
2.09
PRAP.DE:
2.01
CSPX.AS:
2.87
PRAP.DE:
1.24
CSPX.AS:
1.42
PRAP.DE:
0.70
CSPX.AS:
3.14
PRAP.DE:
7.87
CSPX.AS:
13.71
PRAP.DE:
1.06%
CSPX.AS:
1.90%
PRAP.DE:
6.60%
CSPX.AS:
12.49%
PRAP.DE:
-17.18%
CSPX.AS:
-33.65%
PRAP.DE:
-3.25%
CSPX.AS:
-1.10%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRAP.DE achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than CSPX.AS's 2.30% return.
PRAP.DE
1.61%
1.08%
5.90%
8.98%
0.67%
N/A
CSPX.AS
2.30%
-0.51%
16.31%
25.11%
15.47%
13.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRAP.DE vs. CSPX.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRAP.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CSPX.AS's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PRAP.DE vs. CSPX.AS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PRAP.DE
CSPX.AS
PRAP.DE vs. CSPX.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF (PRAP.DE) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PRAP.DE vs. CSPX.AS - Dividend Comparison
Neither PRAP.DE nor CSPX.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
PRAP.DE vs. CSPX.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRAP.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.18%, smaller than the maximum CSPX.AS drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRAP.DE and CSPX.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PRAP.DE vs. CSPX.AS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF (PRAP.DE) is 1.41%, while iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSPX.AS) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that PRAP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSPX.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.